Cardiology department, Pasteur University Hospital, 30 voie Romaine, Nice, France.
J Med Syst. 2024 Mar 5;48(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02039-1.
The Virtual Reality Headset (VRH) is a device aiming at improving patient's comfort by reducing pain and anxiety during medical interventions. Its interest during cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implant procedures has not been studied.
We randomized consecutive patients admitted for pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) at our center to either standard analgesia care (STD-Group), or to VRH (VRH-Group). Patients in the STD-Group received intra-venous paracetamol (1 g) 60 min before the procedure, and local anesthesia was performed with lidocaine. For patients of the VRH-Group, VRH was used on top of standard care. We monitored patients' pain and anxiety using numeric rating scales (from 0 to 10) at the time of sub-cutaneous pocket creation, and during deep axillary vein puncture. Patient comfort during the procedure was assessed using a detailed questionnaire. Morphine consumption was also assessed.
We randomized 61 patients to STD-Group (n = 31) or VRH-Group (n = 30). Pain and anxiety were lower in the VRH-Group during deep venous puncture (3.0 ± 2.0 vs. 4.8 ± 2.2, p = 0.002 and 2.4 ± 2.2 vs. 4.1 ± 2.4, p = 0.006) but not during pocket creation (p = 0.58 and p = 0.5). Morphine consumption was lower in the VRH-Group (1.6 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 1.1 mg; p = 0.041). Patients' overall comfort during procedure was similar in both groups.
VRH use improved pain and anxiety control during deep venous puncture compared to standard analgesia care, and allowed morphine consumption reduction. However, pain and anxiety were similar at the time of sub-cutaneous pocket creation.
虚拟现实头戴设备(VRH)旨在通过减少医疗干预期间的疼痛和焦虑来提高患者舒适度。但其在心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)植入手术中的应用尚未得到研究。
我们将连续入组于我院行起搏器或植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入的患者随机分为标准镇痛护理组(STD-Group)或 VRH 组(VRH-Group)。STD-Group 患者在手术前 60 分钟静脉给予对乙酰氨基酚(1 g),并给予利多卡因局部麻醉。VRH-Group 患者在标准护理的基础上使用 VRH。我们使用数字评分量表(0-10 分)在皮下囊袋制作时和深腋静脉穿刺时监测患者的疼痛和焦虑程度。使用详细的问卷评估患者在手术过程中的舒适度。还评估了吗啡的消耗量。
我们将 61 例患者随机分为 STD-Group(n = 31)或 VRH-Group(n = 30)。在深静脉穿刺时,VRH-Group 的疼痛和焦虑程度较低(3.0 ± 2.0 与 4.8 ± 2.2,p = 0.002 和 2.4 ± 2.2 与 4.1 ± 2.4,p = 0.006),但在囊袋制作时无差异(p = 0.58 和 p = 0.5)。VRH-Group 的吗啡消耗量较低(1.6 ± 0.7 与 2.1 ± 1.1 mg;p = 0.041)。两组患者在手术过程中的整体舒适度相似。
与标准镇痛护理相比,VRH 可改善深静脉穿刺时的疼痛和焦虑控制,并减少吗啡的消耗。然而,在皮下囊袋制作时,疼痛和焦虑程度相似。