Fernandes Sara M, Mendes Augusto J, Rodrigues Pedro F S, Conde Ana, Rocha Magda, Leite Jorge
CINTESIS@RISE, CINTESIS.UPT, Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.
Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Apr-Jun;24(2):100452. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100452. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are two of the most used non-pharmacological interventions for Alzheimer's Disease (AD). However, most of the clinical trials have focused on evaluating the effects on global cognition and not on specific cognitive functions. Therefore, considering that memory loss is one of the hallmark symptoms of AD, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of tDCS and rTMS in memory deficits. For that, multilevel random effect models were performed considering the standardized mean difference (SMD) between active and sham stimulation. A total of 19 studies with 411 participants demonstrated positive effects in memory after tDCS (SMD=0.20, = 0.04) and rTMS (SMD=0.44, = 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that tDCS had greater efficacy when administered in temporal regions (SMD=0.32, = 0.04), whereas rTMS was superior when applied in frontal regions (SMD=0.61, < 0.001). Therefore, depending on the brain region of stimulation, both interventions produced a positive effect on memory symptoms in AD patients. Finally, the safety of both techniques was observed in the AD population after the reporting of almost no serious events.
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)最常用的两种非药物干预措施。然而,大多数临床试验都集中在评估对整体认知的影响,而非特定的认知功能。因此,鉴于记忆丧失是AD的标志性症状之一,我们旨在评估tDCS和rTMS对记忆缺陷的疗效和安全性。为此,我们采用多水平随机效应模型,考虑主动刺激和假刺激之间的标准化平均差(SMD)。共有19项研究、411名参与者,结果表明tDCS(SMD = 0.20,P = 0.04)和rTMS(SMD = 0.44,P = 0.001)后对记忆有积极影响。亚组分析显示,tDCS在颞区给药时疗效更佳(SMD = 0.32,P = 0.04),而rTMS应用于额叶时效果更佳(SMD = 0.61,P < 0.001)。因此,根据刺激的脑区不同,这两种干预措施对AD患者的记忆症状均产生了积极影响。最后,在报告几乎没有严重事件后,观察到这两种技术在AD人群中的安全性。