Palo Alto University, United States.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2024 Sep;84:101956. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2024.101956. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
Attentional hypervigilance to threat in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an important topic to investigate. Efforts to leverage attention training to prevent PTSD have been promising but underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. The current study tested whether Attention Bias Modification (ABM) prior to an emotion induction of fear could reduce self-reported fear and arousal compared to two control conditions.
Participants (N = 86) were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and randomized to receive either (1) ABM where they were directed towards fear related words on every trial; (2) Attention Control Training (ACT) where they were directed towards fear related words on 50% of trials; or (3) Neutral training where all words were neutral. Participants then completed a fear emotion induction (a 2-min video), reporting fear, arousal, and mood before and after the emotion induction.
Participants in the ABM condition had lower fear compared to the Neutral condition b = 11.43, 95% CI (1.20, 21.65), d = 0.48. Participants in the ABM condition did not have lower fear compared to the ACT condition b = 9.75, 95% CI (-0.64, 19.96), d = 0.41. Importantly, attentional avoidance at baseline moderated the effect of condition for both fear and arousal; higher avoidance at baseline for the ABM condition was associated with lower fear and arousal after the emotion induction compared to the Neutral condition.
The sample size was relatively small and limited in diversity.
These findings are the first experimental evidence showing that the benefit of ABM prior to a fearful experience may be in its reduction of the target emotion. Additionally, ABM may work best for those that demonstrate the most avoidance at baseline in their attention towards fearful stimuli.
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者对威胁的注意力过度警觉是一个重要的研究课题。利用注意训练来预防 PTSD 的努力是有希望的,但潜在的机制尚未完全阐明。本研究测试了在恐惧情绪诱导之前进行注意偏差修正(ABM)是否可以与两种对照条件相比,降低自我报告的恐惧和唤醒程度。
参与者(N=86)从亚马逊 Mechanical Turk 招募,并随机分配接受以下三种条件之一:(1)ABM,在每次试验中都指向与恐惧相关的单词;(2)注意力控制训练(ACT),在 50%的试验中指向与恐惧相关的单词;或(3)中性训练,所有单词均为中性。然后,参与者完成了恐惧情绪诱导(2 分钟的视频),在情绪诱导前后报告恐惧、唤醒和情绪。
与中性条件相比,ABM 条件下的参与者恐惧程度较低 b=11.43,95%CI(1.20,21.65),d=0.48。与 ACT 条件相比,ABM 条件下的参与者恐惧程度没有降低 b=9.75,95%CI(-0.64,19.96),d=0.41。重要的是,基线时的注意力回避调节了条件对恐惧和唤醒的影响;ABM 条件下的基线回避越高,与中性条件相比,在情绪诱导后,恐惧和唤醒程度越低。
样本量相对较小,且多样性有限。
这些发现是第一个实验证据,表明在恐惧体验之前进行 ABM 的益处可能在于降低目标情绪。此外,对于那些在对恐惧刺激的注意力方面表现出最大回避的人来说,ABM 可能效果最好。