University of Innsbruck, Department of Psychology, Innsbruck, Austria.
University of Zaragoza, Department of Psychology, Zaragoza, Spain.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2024 Apr;198:112327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112327. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
The present systematic review and meta-analysis intended to: 1) determine the extent of abnormalities in emotional processing linked to emotional event-related potentials (ERPs) in Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) and 2) integrate data from similar emotional tasks into a meta-analysis to clearly demonstrate the scientific and clinical value of measuring emotional ERPs by electroencephalography (EEG) in FMS.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing emotional processing indicated by ERPs in FMS patients and healthy controls was conducted. Fifteen articles were included in the systematic review after applying the eligibility criteria.
Nine articles demonstrated disturbances in emotional processing in FMS. These emotional disturbances were distributed over the whole range of ERP latencies, mainly over central, parietal, temporal and occipital areas. Despite of this, quantitative analysis revealed only significant differences in N250 and LPP/LPC between FMS patients and healthy controls, with smaller LPP/LPC and greater N250 seen in FMS.
N250 and LPP/LPC seem to be the ERPs with the greatest potential to determine emotional alterations in FMS. These ERPs are related to complex cognitive processes such as decoding features relevant to affect recognition (N250) as well differentiation between emotions, persistent engagement, conflict resolution or evaluation of emotional intensity (LPC/LPP). However, differences in task setup had an important impact on the variation of ERP outcomes. Systematization of protocols and tasks is indispensable for future studies.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在:1)确定纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)中与情绪事件相关电位(ERP)相关的情绪处理异常的程度,2)将类似情绪任务的数据整合到荟萃分析中,以清楚地展示脑电图(EEG)测量 FMS 中情绪 ERP 的科学和临床价值。
对比较 FMS 患者和健康对照组的 ERP 所示情绪处理的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。应用合格标准后,有 15 篇文章被纳入系统评价。
9 篇文章表明 FMS 存在情绪处理障碍。这些情绪障碍分布在整个 ERP 潜伏期范围内,主要分布在中央、顶叶、颞叶和枕叶区域。尽管如此,定量分析仅显示 FMS 患者与健康对照组之间在 N250 和 LPP/LPC 上存在显著差异,FMS 患者的 LPP/LPC 较小,N250 较大。
N250 和 LPP/LPC 似乎是最有潜力确定 FMS 中情绪改变的 ERP。这些 ERP 与复杂的认知过程有关,例如解码与情感识别相关的特征(N250)以及区分情绪、持续参与、冲突解决或评估情感强度(LPC/LPP)。然而,任务设置的差异对 ERP 结果的变化有重要影响。未来的研究需要对方案和任务进行系统化。