Department of Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary.
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Aug;84(2):195-204.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.12.023. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: A history of prior abdominal procedures may influence the likelihood of referral for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion. To guide clinical decision making in this population, this study examined the association between prior abdominal procedures and outcomes in patients undergoing PD catheter insertion.
Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing their first PD catheter insertion between November 1, 2011, and November 1, 2020, at 11 institutions in Canada and the United States participating in the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis North American Catheter Registry.
Prior abdominal procedure(s) defined as any procedure that enters the peritoneal cavity.
The primary outcome was time to the first of (1) abandonment of the PD catheter or (2) interruption/termination of PD. Secondary outcomes were rates of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and procedures.
Cumulative incidence curves were used to describe the risk over time, and an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between the exposure and primary outcome. Models for count data were used to estimate the associations between the exposure and secondary outcomes.
Of 855 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 31% had a history of a prior abdominal procedure and 20% experienced at least 1 PD catheter-related complication that led to the primary outcome. Prior abdominal procedures were not associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.68-1.84). Upper-abdominal procedures were associated with a higher adjusted hazard of the primary outcome, but there was no dose-response relationship concerning the number of procedures. There was no association between prior abdominal procedures and other secondary outcomes.
Observational study and cohort limited to a sample of patients believed to be potential candidates for PD catheter insertion.
A history of prior abdominal procedure(s) does not appear to influence catheter outcomes following PD catheter insertion. Such a history should not be a contraindication to PD.
PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a life-saving therapy for individuals with kidney failure that can be done at home. PD requires the placement of a tube, or catheter, into the abdomen to allow the exchange of dialysis fluid during treatment. There is concern that individuals who have undergone prior abdominal procedures and are referred for a catheter might have scarring that could affect catheter function. In some institutions, they might not even be offered PD therapy as an option. In this study, we found that a history of prior abdominal procedures did not increase the risk of PD catheter complications and should not dissuade patients from choosing PD or providers from recommending it.
既往腹部手术史可能影响腹膜透析(PD)导管置入患者的转诊可能性。为了在该人群中指导临床决策,本研究探讨了既往腹部手术与 PD 导管置入患者结局之间的关系。
回顾性队列研究。
2011 年 11 月 1 日至 2020 年 11 月 1 日期间,加拿大和美国的 11 家参与国际腹膜透析协会北美导管注册研究的机构中,首次接受 PD 导管置入的成年人。
既往腹部手术史定义为进入腹腔的任何手术。
主要结局为首次发生(1)PD 导管废弃或(2)PD 中断/终止的时间。次要结局为急诊就诊、住院和手术的发生率。
使用累积发生率曲线描述随时间的风险,使用调整后的 Cox 比例风险模型估计暴露与主要结局之间的关联。使用计数数据模型估计暴露与次要结局之间的关联。
在符合纳入标准的 855 名患者中,31%有既往腹部手术史,20%发生至少 1 次与 PD 导管相关的并发症,导致主要结局。既往腹部手术史与主要结局风险增加无关(调整后的 HR,1.12;95%CI,0.68-1.84)。上腹部手术与主要结局的调整后风险较高相关,但与手术次数之间没有剂量-反应关系。既往腹部手术史与其他次要结局之间无关联。
观察性研究,队列仅限于被认为是 PD 导管插入潜在候选者的患者样本。
既往腹部手术史似乎不会影响 PD 导管插入后的导管结局。此类病史不应成为 PD 的禁忌症。
腹膜透析(PD)是一种挽救生命的肾衰竭治疗方法,可以在家中进行。PD 需要将导管插入腹部,以便在治疗过程中交换透析液。有人担心,接受过既往腹部手术并接受导管治疗的患者可能会有影响导管功能的疤痕。在一些机构,他们甚至可能不被提供 PD 治疗作为一种选择。在这项研究中,我们发现既往腹部手术史并没有增加 PD 导管并发症的风险,也不应该阻止患者选择 PD 或阻止医生推荐 PD。