Rukerd Mohammad Rezaei Zadeh, Erfaniparsa Lida, Movahedi Mitra, Mirkamali Hanieh, Alizadeh Seyed Danial, Ilaghi Mehran, Sadeghifar Amirreza, Barazandehpoor Saeed, Hashemian Morteza, Pourzand Pouria, Mirafzal Amirhossein
HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman Iran.
Department of Emergency Medicine Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman Iran.
Acute Med Surg. 2024 Mar 6;11(1):e936. doi: 10.1002/ams2.936. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Femoral fractures are one of the most debilitating injuries presenting to the emergency departments (EDs). The pain caused by these fractures is typically managed with opioids and adjunctive regional analgesia. These approaches are often associated with adverse side effects. Thus, appropriate alternative methods should be thoroughly investigated. To evaluate ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (FNB) with ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in femoral fractures, to determine which provides better analgesia and less opioid requirement.
This study was a randomized clinical trial performed on adult patients presenting to the ED within 3 h of isolated femoral fracture with initial numerical pain rating scale (NRS-0) score of more than 5. The patients were randomized to receive FNB or FICB. The outcomes were block success rates, pain at 20 (NRS-20) and 60 (NRS-60) min after the end of the procedures, as well as the number and total dose of fentanyl administration during ED stay.
Eighty-seven patients were recruited (40 FNB and 47 FICB). Success rates were 82.5% in FNB and 83.0% in FICB group, with no significant difference between the groups. NRS-20, NRS-60, the number of patients who received supplemental fentanyl, and the total dose of administered fentanyl were significantly lower following FNB. However, the length of the procedure was significantly lower in the FICB group.
Both FNB and FICB are effective in pain reduction for fractures of femur, but FNB provides more pain relief and less need for supplemental fentanyl.
股骨骨折是急诊科最使人衰弱的损伤之一。这些骨折引起的疼痛通常用阿片类药物和辅助区域镇痛来处理。这些方法常常伴有不良副作用。因此,应全面研究合适的替代方法。为评估超声引导下股神经阻滞(FNB)与超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)用于股骨骨折的情况,以确定哪种方法能提供更好的镇痛效果且减少阿片类药物的用量。
本研究是一项随机临床试验,对象为在孤立性股骨骨折后3小时内就诊于急诊科、初始数字疼痛评分量表(NRS-0)得分超过5分的成年患者。患者被随机分为接受FNB或FICB组。观察指标为阻滞成功率、操作结束后20分钟(NRS-20)和60分钟(NRS-60)时的疼痛程度,以及急诊留观期间芬太尼的给药次数和总剂量。
共招募了87例患者(40例接受FNB,47例接受FICB)。FNB组成功率为82.5%,FICB组为83.0%,两组之间无显著差异。FNB后NRS-20、NRS-60、接受补充芬太尼的患者数量以及芬太尼的总给药剂量均显著更低。然而,FICB组的操作时间显著更短。
FNB和FICB在减轻股骨骨折疼痛方面均有效,但FNB能提供更多的疼痛缓解且对补充芬太尼的需求更少。