Suppr超能文献

股骨近端骨折患者的连续周围神经阻滞:三种技术的随机比较。

Continuous peripheral nerve block in patients with proximal femur fracture: A randomised comparison of three techniques.

作者信息

Bhatia Nidhi, Jain Kajal, Saini Vikas, Saini Uttam C, Khurana Bismanjeet, Makkar Jeetinder K

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Orthopedics, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;69(4):335-342. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1095_24. Epub 2025 Mar 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The literature mentions numerous approaches to peripheral nerve blockade for pain management following proximal femur fractures. We aimed to explore the best analgesic option in these patients while comparing blocks of the femoral nerve and fascia iliaca compartment.

METHODS

Sixty consenting adult trauma patients admitted with proximal femur fractures for surgical fixation under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive either sonography-guided continuous fascia iliaca plane block employing suprainguinal (SFICB group) or infrainguinal (IFICB group) approach or femoral nerve block (FNB group) for postoperative analgesia, using 0.2% ropivacaine as initial bolus (volume based on patient's weight), followed by its continuous infusion @10 mL/h for first 24 h. Intravenous morphine was used as a rescue analgesic (RA) to keep a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of <4. Our primary objective included a total number of RA doses administered in the 24-h postoperative period. As secondary outcomes, total RA consumption, analgesia duration, pain scores, quality of pain relief, and adverse effects were noted.

RESULTS

The number of RA doses administered was significantly lower in the SIFCB group, with 15% of patients requesting RA boluses in the SFICB group as opposed to 40% and 50% of patients in the IFICB and FNB groups, respectively. Patients in the SFICB group had lower median morphine consumption of 3 mg [interquartile range (IQR): 0-3; range: 0-3.5] in the SFICB group versus 6.5 mg (IQR: 4.1-8.0; range: 3-10.5) and 9.0 mg (IQR: 5.3-14.0; range: 3-14) in the IFICB and FNB groups, respectively ( = 0.044), significantly decreased VAS scores, and reported superior quality of pain relief.

CONCLUSION

Following proximal femur fracture surgery, superior pain relief was provided by continuous suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block compared to the infrainguinal approach or simple femoral nerve block.

摘要

背景与目的

文献中提及了多种用于股骨近端骨折后疼痛管理的周围神经阻滞方法。我们旨在探索这些患者的最佳镇痛方案,同时比较股神经阻滞和髂筋膜间隙阻滞。

方法

60例因股骨近端骨折入院接受全身麻醉下手术固定的成年创伤患者,随机分为接受超声引导下采用腹股沟上(SFICB组)或腹股沟下(IFICB组)方法的连续髂筋膜平面阻滞或股神经阻滞(FNB组)进行术后镇痛,初始推注0.2%罗哌卡因(剂量根据患者体重),随后在前24小时以10 mL/h的速度持续输注。静脉注射吗啡用作补救镇痛药(RA),以维持视觉模拟评分(VAS)<4分。我们的主要目标包括术后24小时内使用的RA总剂量。作为次要结果,记录了RA总消耗量、镇痛持续时间、疼痛评分、疼痛缓解质量和不良反应。

结果

SFICB组使用的RA剂量显著更低,SFICB组中15%的患者需要RA推注,而IFICB组和FNB组分别为40%和50%。SFICB组患者的吗啡中位消耗量较低,SFICB组为3 mg[四分位间距(IQR):0 - 3;范围:0 - 3.5],而IFICB组和FNB组分别为6.5 mg(IQR:4.1 - 8.0;范围:3 - 10.5)和9.0 mg(IQR:5.3 - 14.0;范围:3 - 14)(P = 0.044),VAS评分显著降低,且疼痛缓解质量更佳。

结论

股骨近端骨折手术后,与腹股沟下方法或单纯股神经阻滞相比,连续腹股沟上髂筋膜间隙阻滞提供了更好的疼痛缓解效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efce/12275215/727e1933860d/IJA-69-335-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Continuous peripheral nerve block in patients with proximal femur fracture: A randomised comparison of three techniques.
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;69(4):335-342. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1095_24. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Nerve blocks for initial pain management of femoral fractures in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 17;2013(12):CD009587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009587.pub2.
4
Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Preoperative Management of Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;83(6):522-538. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.024. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
6
Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blocks in Proximal Femoral Fractures in the Prehospital Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Apr;38(2):252-258. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23000298. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
7
Dexamethasone as an adjuvant to peripheral nerve block.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 9;11(11):CD011770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011770.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
Nerve Blocks for Post-Surgical Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Research.
J Pain Res. 2024 Oct 2;17:3217-3239. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S476563. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of suprainguinal approach with infrainguinal approach of fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative analgesia.
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;66(Suppl 6):S294-S299. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_823_21. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
6
Fascia Iliaca Block in Hip and Femur Fractures to Reduce Opioid Use.
J Emerg Med. 2022 Jul;63(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.04.018. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
8
A review of evidence-based clinical practice on fascia iliaca compartment block for lower limb injury.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Aug 23;69:102758. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102758. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Mechanisms of action of fascial plane blocks: a narrative review.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jul;46(7):618-628. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102305.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验