The Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(8):1027-1036. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2326601. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
Many patients who are attended by paramedics do not require conveyance to an emergency department (ED). Our study focuses on comparing the characteristics and outcomes of patients who were advised to follow up with a general practitioner (GP) by an attending paramedic with those of patients who were discharged at scene or transported to hospital.
This was a retrospective data linkage cohort study of ambulance, ED, hospital admission, and death records for all adults attended by paramedics in Victoria, Australia between the 1 of January 2015 and 30 of June 2019. Patients were excluded if they presented in cardiac arrest, resided in a residential aged care facility, or were receiving palliative care services. Outcomes of interest included reattendance by ambulance, ED presentation; and, a high acuity outcome which we defined as a patient who (1) presented to ED and received an Australasian Triage Scale of category 1 (Resuscitation) or 2 (Emergency) AND was admitted to a ward OR (2) was admitted to an Intensive Care Unit, Coronary Care Unit or Catheter laboratory (regardless of triage category) OR (3) died. Outcomes of interest were considered within 48-h of initial EMS attendance.
A total of 1,777,950 cases were included in the study of which 3.1% were referred to a GP, 9.0% were discharged at scene without a follow-up recommendation, and 87.9% were transported to hospital. Patients referred to a GP were more likely than those discharged at scene to subsequently present to an ED within 48 h of their attendance (5.3% vs 3.8%). However, GP referral was not associated with any change to high acuity outcome (0.3% vs 0.2%) or ambulance reattendance (6.0% vs 6.0%) compared to discharge at scene. The only factors that were associated with ambulance reattendance, ED presentation, and a high acuity outcome were male gender and elevated temperature.
Despite increasing low and medium-acuity casework in this EMS system, paramedic referral to a GP is not common practice. Referring a patient to a GP did not reduce the likelihood of patients experiencing a high acuity outcome or recalling an ambulance within 48 h, suggesting opportunity exists to refine paramedic to GP referral practices.
许多由护理人员照顾的患者不需要送往急诊部(ED)。我们的研究重点是比较接受护理人员建议由全科医生(GP)跟进的患者与在现场出院或送往医院的患者的特征和结局。
这是一项回顾性数据链接队列研究,对 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日期间在澳大利亚维多利亚州接受护理人员照顾的所有成年人的救护车、ED、住院和死亡记录进行了研究。如果患者出现心脏骤停、居住在养老院或接受姑息治疗服务,则将其排除在外。感兴趣的结局包括再次通过救护车、ED 就诊;以及高急症结局,我们将其定义为(1)到 ED 就诊并接受澳大利亚分诊量表 1 级(复苏)或 2 级(紧急),并被收治到病房或(2)被收治到 ICU、冠心病监护病房或导管实验室(无论分诊类别如何)或(3)死亡。感兴趣的结局在最初的 EMS 就诊后 48 小时内考虑。
共有 1777950 例病例纳入研究,其中 3.1%被转介给 GP,9.0%在现场出院且无后续建议,87.9%被送往医院。与在现场出院的患者相比,被转介给 GP 的患者更有可能在就诊后 48 小时内再次到 ED 就诊(5.3%比 3.8%)。然而,与在现场出院相比,GP 转介与高急症结局(0.3%比 0.2%)或救护车再次就诊(6.0%比 6.0%)无关。唯一与救护车再次就诊、ED 就诊和高急症结局相关的因素是男性性别和体温升高。
尽管该 EMS 系统中低和中急症工作量增加,但护理人员将患者转介给 GP 的情况并不常见。将患者转介给 GP 并不能降低患者出现高急症结局或在 48 小时内召回救护车的可能性,这表明有机会改进护理人员向 GP 的转介实践。