Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间及虚拟急诊科引入后护理人员向全科医生转诊的趋势:一项中断时间序列分析

Trends in paramedic-to-general practitioner referrals following the COVID-19 pandemic and the introduction of a virtual emergency department: an interrupted time series analysis.

作者信息

Delardes Belinda Jane, Nehme Ziad, Bowles Kelly-Ann, Chakraborty Samantha, Mahony Emily, Smith Karen, Talevski Jason, Sher Loren, Nehme Emily

机构信息

Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia

Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Blackburn North, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2025 Jun 19;42(7):460-466. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214561.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent introduction of the Victorian Virtual Emergency Department (VVED) consultation service for paramedics on paramedic-to-general practitioner (GP) referral patterns, case time burden and ambulance reattendance rates.

METHODS

We conducted interrupted time series regression assessing paramedic-to-GP referrals with the following two interruptions: (1) the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 and (2) VVED integration in July 2022. We included ambulance patients between 2018 and 2023 across Victoria, Australia.

RESULTS

A total 3 205 562 patients across 65 months were included; 38.7% presented in the 26 months prior to the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (n=1 239 975), 43.8% between March 2020 and June 2022 (n=1 403 139) and 17.6% in the 11 months after VVED implementation (n=562 448). There was no step change in paramedic-to-GP referrals associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, although a 3% relative monthly trend increase in referrals to GP occurred (incident rate ratio (IRR) 1.03, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.04). Subsequent VVED integration was associated with a -16% relative step change in referrals to GPs (IRR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.96); however, no trend change was observed. Median case time burden increased throughout the study by 0.52 min per month (median difference 0.52 min, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.52). At the study period conclusion, EMS attendances resulting in GP referrals had a 40 min median case cycle duration, compared with 120 min for ED conveyances. Ambulance 7-day reattendance rates were similar between those referred to VVED (8.8%) vs GPs (8.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased paramedic-to-GP referrals in lieu of ambulance conveyances. The VVED was associated with an initial decrease in paramedic-to-GP referrals; however, the trend of increasing GP referrals continued. paramedic-to-GP referrals consumed a third of the time burden associated with ambulance conveyance to ED.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估新冠疫情以及随后为护理人员引入的维多利亚虚拟急诊科(VVED)咨询服务对护理人员向全科医生(GP)的转诊模式、病例时间负担和救护车再次出诊率的影响。

方法

我们进行了中断时间序列回归分析,评估护理人员向全科医生的转诊情况,有以下两次中断:(1)2020年3月的新冠疫情,以及(2)2022年7月VVED的整合。我们纳入了2018年至2023年澳大利亚维多利亚州的救护车患者。

结果

共纳入了65个月内的3205562名患者;38.7%在新冠疫情开始前的26个月内就诊(n = 1239975),43.8%在2020年3月至2022年6月之间就诊(n = 1403139),17.6%在VVED实施后的11个月内就诊(n = 562448)。与新冠疫情相关的护理人员向全科医生的转诊没有出现阶跃变化,尽管转诊至全科医生的相对月度趋势增加了3%(发病率比(IRR)1.03,95%置信区间1.02至1.04)。随后的VVED整合与转诊至全科医生的相对阶跃变化-16%相关(IRR 0.84,95%置信区间0.74至0.96);然而,未观察到趋势变化。在整个研究过程中,病例时间负担中位数每月增加0.52分钟(中位数差异0.52分钟,95%置信区间0.51至0.52)。在研究期结束时,导致转诊至全科医生的急救医疗服务出诊病例的中位病程持续时间为40分钟,而转诊至急诊科的为120分钟。转诊至VVED的患者与转诊至全科医生的患者的救护车7天再次出诊率相似(分别为8.8%和8.7%)。

结论

新冠疫情与护理人员向全科医生的转诊增加以替代救护车转运相关。VVED与护理人员向全科医生的转诊最初减少相关;然而,转诊至全科医生的增加趋势仍在继续。护理人员向全科医生的转诊消耗了与救护车转运至急诊科相关的时间负担的三分之一。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验