• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过于轶事化,难以置信?机械 Turk 并非全是机器人和不良数据:对 Webb 和 Tangney(2022)的回应。

Too Anecdotal to Be True? Mechanical Turk Is Not All Bots and Bad Data: Response to Webb and Tangney (2022).

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University.

Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth University.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Nov;19(6):900-907. doi: 10.1177/17456916241234328. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1177/17456916241234328
PMID:38451252
Abstract

In response to Webb and Tangney (2022) we call into question the conclusion that data collected on Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) was "at best-only 2.6% valid" (p. 1). We suggest that Webb and Tangney made certain choices during the study-design and data-collection process that adversely affected the quality of the data collected. As a result, the anecdotal experience of these authors provides weak evidence that MTurk provides low-quality data as implied. In our commentary we highlight best practice recommendations and make suggestions for more effectively collecting and screening online panel data.

摘要

针对 Webb 和 Tangney(2022)的观点,我们对“在亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk(MTurk)上收集的数据‘最多只有 2.6%是有效的’”这一结论提出质疑。我们认为,Webb 和 Tangney 在研究设计和数据收集过程中做出了某些选择,这些选择对收集数据的质量产生了不利影响。因此,这些作者的轶事经验提供了微弱的证据,表明 MTurk 提供的是低质量的数据。在我们的评论中,我们强调了最佳实践建议,并提出了更有效地收集和筛选在线面板数据的建议。

相似文献

1
Too Anecdotal to Be True? Mechanical Turk Is Not All Bots and Bad Data: Response to Webb and Tangney (2022).过于轶事化,难以置信?机械 Turk 并非全是机器人和不良数据:对 Webb 和 Tangney(2022)的回应。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Nov;19(6):900-907. doi: 10.1177/17456916241234328. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
2
The Burden for High-Quality Online Data Collection Lies With Researchers, Not Recruitment Platforms.高质量在线数据收集的负担在于研究人员,而不是招聘平台。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Nov;19(6):891-899. doi: 10.1177/17456916241242734. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
3
Too Good to Be True: Bots and Bad Data From Mechanical Turk.好得难以置信:来自 Mechanical Turk 的机器人和不良数据。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Nov;19(6):887-890. doi: 10.1177/17456916221120027. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Using online, crowdsourcing platforms for data collection in personality disorder research: The example of Amazon's Mechanical Turk.在人格障碍研究中利用在线众包平台进行数据收集:以亚马逊的土耳其机器人平台为例。
Personal Disord. 2017 Jan;8(1):26-34. doi: 10.1037/per0000191.
5
Ethical concerns arising from recruiting workers from Amazon's Mechanical Turk as research participants: Commentary on Burnette et al. (2021).从亚马逊土耳其机器人招募工人作为研究参与者引发的伦理问题:对 Burnette 等人(2021)的评论。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Feb;55(2):276-277. doi: 10.1002/eat.23658. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
6
Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices.在成瘾研究中使用 Mechanical Turk 进行数据收集:效用、关注点和最佳实践。
Addiction. 2020 Oct;115(10):1960-1968. doi: 10.1111/add.15032. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
7
Recruiting older adult participants through crowdsourcing platforms: Mechanical Turk versus Prolific Academic.通过众包平台招募老年参与者:Turk 还是 Prolific Academic。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:1230-1238. eCollection 2020.
8
Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature.将亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk 平台与健康和医学研究文献中的传统数据收集方法进行比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):533-538. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4246-0. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
9
Using Mechanical Turk for research on cancer survivors.利用 Mechanical Turk 进行癌症幸存者研究。
Psychooncology. 2017 Oct;26(10):1593-1603. doi: 10.1002/pon.4173. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
10
Screening Amazon's Mechanical Turk for Adults With ADHD.在亚马逊土耳其机器人上为患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的成年人进行筛查。
J Atten Disord. 2019 Aug;23(10):1178-1187. doi: 10.1177/1087054715597471. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Imposters, Bots, and Other Threats to Data Integrity in Online Research: Scoping Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Best Practices.冒名顶替者、机器人及在线研究中数据完整性面临的其他威胁:文献综述与最佳实践建议
Online J Public Health Inform. 2025 Aug 29;17:e70926. doi: 10.2196/70926.
2
Preference reversals in ethicality judgments of medical treatments.医疗治疗伦理判断中的偏好逆转
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0319233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319233. eCollection 2025.