Graduate Department of Psychology, Laney Graduate School, Emory University.
Candler School of Theology, Emory University.
Hist Psychol. 2024 Aug;27(3):227-245. doi: 10.1037/hop0000255. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
William James delivered the prestigious Gifford Lectures at the University of Edinburgh in 1901 and 1902, and his 20 lectures were published as . While the book is a classic in the psychology of religion, little to no attention has been given to the immediate context of James's lectures or his state of mind and perspectives during his delivery of each. This study aimed to understand James's 20 Gifford Lectures as separable performances and to uncover his experience of delivering each. We placed in conversation two first-hand accounts of the lectures- newspaper reports and James's correspondence. A word-count methodology was used to compare the newspaper reports among themselves. The results showed that the separate reports by James and were strongly correlated. For instance, both James and reported that the 1901 lectures were better received than the 1902 lectures. Further, both confirm that James and his audience engaged each other in a complicated dance involving competing expectations and worldviews. The results demonstrate that viewing the lectures as performance events experienced by James within personal and societal historical contexts clarifies our understanding of James, each of his 20 lectures, and the book that enshrined them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
威廉·詹姆斯于 1901 年和 1902 年在爱丁堡大学发表了著名的吉福德讲座,他的 20 讲讲座被出版为 。虽然这本书是宗教心理学的经典著作,但几乎没有人关注詹姆斯讲座的直接背景,也没有人关注他在每次讲座中的心态和观点。本研究旨在将詹姆斯的 20 场吉福德讲座理解为可分离的表演,并揭示他在每次演讲中的体验。我们将两个关于讲座的第一手资料——报纸报道和詹姆斯的信件进行了对话。我们使用字数统计方法来比较报纸报道之间的差异。结果表明,詹姆斯和 的单独报道之间存在很强的相关性。例如,詹姆斯和 都报告说,1901 年的讲座比 1902 年的讲座更受欢迎。此外,他们都证实,詹姆斯和他的听众在一场复杂的舞蹈中相互参与,涉及相互竞争的期望和世界观。研究结果表明,将讲座视为詹姆斯在个人和社会历史背景下经历的表演事件,可以更清楚地理解詹姆斯、他的 20 场讲座以及收录这些讲座的著作。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。