National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Neonatal Diseases, Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University GRADE Center, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Pediatr Neurol. 2024 May;154:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.01.018. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
The pathophysiology and the potential risks of placental transfusion (PT) differ substantially in preterm infants, necessitating specific studies in this population. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PT in preterm infants from the perspective of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.
We conducted a systematic literature search using placental transfusion, preterm infant, and its synonyms as search terms. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Embase were searched until March 07, 2023. Two reviewers independently identified, extracted relevant randomized controlled trials, and appraised the risk of bias. The extracted studies were included in the meta-analysis of long-term neurodevelopmental clinical outcomes using fixed-effects models.
A total of 5612 articles were identified, and seven randomized controlled trials involving 2551 infants were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with immediate cord clamping (ICC), PT may not impact adverse neurodevelopment events. No clear evidence was found of a difference in the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment (risk ratio [RR]: 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76 to 1.03, P = 0.13, I = 0). PT was not associated with the incidence of cerebral palsy (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.59 to 2.57, P = 0.79, I = 0). Analyses showed no differences between the two interventions in cognitive, language, and motor domains of neurodevelopment.
From the perspective of long-term neurodevelopment, PT at preterm birth may be as safe as ICC. Future studies should focus on standardized, high-quality clinical trials and individual participant data to optimize cord management strategies for preterm infants after birth.
胎盘输血(PT)在早产儿中的病理生理学和潜在风险有很大的不同,因此需要对此类人群进行专门的研究。本研究旨在从长期神经发育结局的角度评估 PT 在早产儿中的安全性和疗效。
我们使用胎盘输血、早产儿及其同义词作为检索词进行了系统的文献检索。检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Medline 和 Embase,检索时间截至 2023 年 3 月 07 日。两位评审员独立识别、提取了相关的随机对照试验,并评估了偏倚风险。使用固定效应模型对长期神经发育临床结局的提取研究进行了荟萃分析。
共确定了 5612 篇文章,有 7 项随机对照试验纳入了 2551 名婴儿,纳入了我们的荟萃分析。与即刻脐带结扎(ICC)相比,PT 可能不会影响不良神经发育事件。没有明确的证据表明神经发育障碍风险存在差异(风险比 [RR]:0.89,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.76 至 1.03,P=0.13,I=0)。PT 与脑瘫的发生率无关(RR:1.23,95% CI:0.59 至 2.57,P=0.79,I=0)。分析表明,两种干预措施在神经发育的认知、语言和运动领域均无差异。
从长期神经发育的角度来看,早产儿 PT 可能与 ICC 一样安全。未来的研究应侧重于标准化、高质量的临床试验和个体参与者数据,以优化早产儿出生后的脐带管理策略。