Buchholz Erik, Gillespie Nathan A, Hunt Jack F, Reynolds Chandra A, Rissman Robert A, Schroeder Angelica, Cortes Isaac, Bell Tyler, Lyons Michael J, Kremen William S, Franz Carol E
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Age Ageing. 2024 Mar 1;53(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae028.
The study explores whether frailty at midlife predicts mortality and levels of biomarkers associated with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and neurodegeneration by early old age. We also examine the heritability of frailty across this age period.
Participants were 1,286 community-dwelling men from the Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging at average ages 56, 62 and 68, all without ADRD at baseline. The cumulative deficit frailty index (FI) comprised 37 items assessing multiple physiological systems. Plasma biomarkers at age 68 included beta-amyloid (Aβ40, Aβ42), total tau (t-tau) and neurofilament light chain (NfL).
Being frail doubled the risk of all-cause mortality by age 68 (OR = 2.44). Age 56 FI significantly predicted age 68 NfL (P = 0.014), Aβ40 (P = 0.001) and Aβ42 (P = 0.023), but not t-tau. Age 62 FI predicted all biomarkers at age 68: NfL (P = 0.023), Aβ40 (P = 0.002), Aβ42 (P = 0.001) and t-tau (P = 0.001). Age 68 FI scores were associated with age 68 levels of NfL (P = 0.027), Aβ40 (P < 0.001), Aβ42 (P = 0.001) and t-tau (P = 0.003). Genetic influences accounted for 45-48% of the variance in frailty and significantly contributed to its stability across 11 years.
Frailty during one's 50s doubled the risk of mortality by age 68. A mechanism linking frailty and ADRD may be through its associations with biomarkers related to neurodegeneration. Cumulative deficit frailty increases with age but remains moderately heritable across the age range studied. With environmental factors accounting for about half of its variance, early interventions aimed at reducing frailty may help to reduce risk for ADRD.
本研究探讨中年时期的衰弱是否能预测死亡率以及与阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)和神经退行性变相关的生物标志物水平,直至老年早期。我们还研究了这一年龄段衰弱的遗传性。
参与者为1286名来自越南战争时期双生子衰老研究的社区男性,平均年龄分别为56岁、62岁和68岁,基线时均无ADRD。累积缺陷衰弱指数(FI)由37个评估多个生理系统的项目组成。68岁时的血浆生物标志物包括β-淀粉样蛋白(Aβ40、Aβ42)、总tau蛋白(t-tau)和神经丝轻链(NfL)。
到68岁时,衰弱使全因死亡率风险增加一倍(OR = 2.44)。56岁时的FI显著预测了68岁时的NfL(P = 0.014)、Aβ40(P = 0.001)和Aβ42(P = 0.023),但不能预测t-tau。62岁时的FI预测了68岁时的所有生物标志物:NfL(P = 0.023)、Aβ40(P = 0.002)、Aβ42(P = 0.001)和t-tau(P = 0.001)。68岁时的FI得分与68岁时的NfL水平(P = 0.027)、Aβ40(P < 0.001)、Aβ42(P = 0.001)和t-tau(P = 0.003)相关。遗传影响占衰弱变异的45%-48%,并对其11年的稳定性有显著贡献。
50多岁时的衰弱使68岁时的死亡风险增加一倍。衰弱与ADRD之间的一种机制可能是通过其与神经退行性变相关生物标志物的关联。累积缺陷衰弱随年龄增加,但在所研究的年龄范围内仍具有中度遗传性。由于环境因素约占其变异的一半,旨在减少衰弱的早期干预可能有助于降低ADRD的风险。