• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自英国的[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2]的商品风险评估。 (你原文中“and”前后植物名称缺失,我按格式补充了[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2])

Commodity risk assessment of and plants from the UK.

作者信息

Bragard Claude, Baptista Paula, Chatzivassiliou Elisavet, Di Serio Francesco, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Milonas Panagiotis, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Potting Roel, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Stefani Emilio, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Van der Werf Wopke, Civera Antonio Vicent, Yuen Jonathan, Zappalà Lucia, Battisti Andrea, Mas Hugo, Rigling Daniel, Faccoli Massimo, Mikulová Alžběta, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Stergulc Fabio, Streissl Franz, Gonthier Paolo

出版信息

EFSA J. 2024 Mar 7;22(3):e8648. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8648. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8648
PMID:38455154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10918603/
Abstract

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of the evergreen and the semi-evergreen imported from the United Kingdom (UK) as: (a) bare root plants and (b) plants in pots, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the UK. The category (a) 'bare root plants' includes bundles of 1- to 3-year-old bare root whips or transplants and single 1- to 7-year-old bare root plants. The category (b) 'plants in pots' includes bundles of 1- to 2-year-old cell grown plants (only ) and 1- to 5-year-old plants in pots. All pests associated with the commodities were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. Two EU quarantine pests, and , and one pest not regulated in the EU, , fulfilled all relevant criteria and were selected for further evaluation. For the selected pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from the UK were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. For these pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom considering the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. In the assessment of risk, the age of the plants was considered, reasoning that older trees are more likely to be infested mainly due to longer exposure time and larger size. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9915 and 10,000 per 10,000 bare root plants and plants in pots will be free from .

摘要

欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组对欧盟委员会实施条例(EU)2018/2019中列为“高风险植物、植物产品及其他物品”的商品进行风险评估并提交报告。本科学意见涵盖从英国进口的常绿和半常绿植物所带来的植物健康风险,这些植物包括:(a) 裸根植物和 (b) 盆栽植物,评估时考虑了现有科学信息,包括英国提供的技术信息。类别 (a)“裸根植物”包括1至3年生裸根枝或移栽苗束以及单株1至7年生裸根植物。类别 (b)“盆栽植物”包括1至2年生穴盘苗束(仅)和1至5年生盆栽植物。针对与这些商品相关的所有有害生物,依据与本意见相关的特定标准进行了评估。两种欧盟检疫性有害生物,即[有害生物名称1]和[有害生物名称2],以及一种在欧盟未受管制的有害生物,即[有害生物名称3],满足所有相关标准并被选作进一步评估对象。对于选定的有害生物,考虑到可能的限制因素,对英国技术档案中提出的风险缓解措施进行了评估。对于这些有害生物,在考虑作用于有害生物的风险缓解措施(包括评估相关的不确定性)的情况下,就是否可能不存在有害生物给出了专家判断。在风险评估中,考虑了植物的年龄,理由是树龄越大,受侵染的可能性越高,主要是因为暴露时间更长且植株更大。在所评估的有害生物中,不存在有害生物的程度各不相同,[有害生物名称1]是进口植物上最常预期出现的有害生物。专家知识启发法以95%的确定性表明,每10,000株裸根植物和盆栽植物中,有9915至10,000株将不存在[有害生物名称1]。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/39ef5be180e2/EFS2-22-e8648-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/5cc51d52d36e/EFS2-22-e8648-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/e09d556d118f/EFS2-22-e8648-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/729e6c727ab7/EFS2-22-e8648-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/dc5d80b5298d/EFS2-22-e8648-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/678103a89e60/EFS2-22-e8648-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/999465b9033e/EFS2-22-e8648-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/96a217ec560b/EFS2-22-e8648-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/11f89631906e/EFS2-22-e8648-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/39ef5be180e2/EFS2-22-e8648-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/5cc51d52d36e/EFS2-22-e8648-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/e09d556d118f/EFS2-22-e8648-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/729e6c727ab7/EFS2-22-e8648-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/dc5d80b5298d/EFS2-22-e8648-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/678103a89e60/EFS2-22-e8648-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/999465b9033e/EFS2-22-e8648-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/96a217ec560b/EFS2-22-e8648-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/11f89631906e/EFS2-22-e8648-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3543/10918603/39ef5be180e2/EFS2-22-e8648-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of and plants from the UK.来自英国的[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2]的商品风险评估。 (你原文中“and”前后植物名称缺失,我按格式补充了[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2])
EFSA J. 2024 Mar 7;22(3):e8648. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8648. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Commodity risk assessment of and plants from the UK.对来自英国的[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2]进行商品风险评估。 (你提供的原文中“and”前后缺少具体内容,我根据翻译要求进行了补充说明)
EFSA J. 2024 Nov 4;22(11):e9051. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9051. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.英国植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2025 Feb 24;23(2):e9277. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9277. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.英国植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jan 12;22(1):e8495. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8495. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.英国植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 6;21(7):e08071. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8071. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.英国植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 28;21(7):e08118. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8118. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Oct 30;21(10):e08314. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8314. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Oct 30;21(10):e08313. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8313. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Commodity risk assessment of and plants from the UK.来自英国的[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2]的商品风险评估。 需注意,你提供的原文中“and”前后内容缺失,以上译文是根据补充完整后的正常理解给出的,实际翻译时需明确具体所指植物。
EFSA J. 2025 Apr 28;23(4):e9384. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9384. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
Commodity risk assessment of , and plants from the UK.来自英国的[具体植物名称未给出]、[具体植物名称未给出]和[具体植物名称未给出]植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2025 Mar 24;23(3):e9305. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9305. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidance on commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers.用于评估高风险植物档案的商品风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 29;17(4):e05668. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5668. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
3
The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment.欧洲食品安全局科学评估中不确定性分析指南背后的原则和方法。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05122. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5122. eCollection 2018 Jan.
4
ScaleNet: a literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics.ScaleNet:基于文献的蚧壳虫生物学与系统学模型。
Database (Oxford). 2016 Feb 9;2016. doi: 10.1093/database/bav118. Print 2016.