• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国植物的商品风险评估。

Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.

作者信息

Civera Antonio Vicent, Baptista Paula, Berlin Anna, Chatzivassiliou Elisavet, Cubero Jaime, Cunniffe Nik, de la Peña Eduardo, Desneux Nicolas, Di Serio Francesco, Filipiak Anna, Hasiów-Jaroszewska Beata, Jactel Hervé, Landa Blanca, Maistrello Lara, Makowski David, Milonas Panagiotis, Papadopoulos Nikos, Potting Roel, Susi Hanna, van Der Gaag Dirk Jan, Battisti Andrea, Bragard Claude, Sven Magnusson Christer, Mas Hugo, Rigling Daniel, Faccoli Massimo, Mikulová Alžběta, Stergulc Fabio, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Streissl Franz, Gonthier Paolo

出版信息

EFSA J. 2025 Feb 24;23(2):e9277. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9277. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9277
PMID:39995438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11848423/
Abstract

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of imported from the United Kingdom (UK) as: (a) bundles of 2-year-old bare root plants (whips), (b) 2- to 7-year-old bare root plants, either exported as single plants or in bundles, (c) 2-year-old cell grown plants exported in bundles, and (d) 3- to 15-year-old plants in pots. The assessment was performed considering the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the UK. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. One EU quarantine pest, (non-EU isolates) fulfilled all relevant criteria and was selected for further evaluation. For the selected pest, the risk mitigation measures implemented in the technical dossier from the UK were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. An expert judgement was given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The fact that is an evergreen plant on which can cause foliar infection was considered a critical element in the risk assessment. In addition, the age of the plants was considered, reasoning that older trees are more likely to be infected mainly due to longer exposure time and larger size. The degree of pest freedom slightly differs between bare root plants (including whips) and plants in pots (including cell grown plants), with plants in pots being less likely pest free. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE) indicated with 95% certainty that between 9699 and 10,000 3- to 15-year-old plants in pots and bundles of 2-year-old cell grown plants per 10,000 will be free from (non-EU isolates).

摘要

欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组针对委员会实施条例(欧盟)2018/2019中列为“高风险植物、植物产品及其他物品”的商品编写并提供风险评估报告。本科学意见涵盖从英国进口的植物所带来的植物健康风险,这些植物包括:(a) 两年生裸根植物束(枝梢),(b) 2至7年生裸根植物,以单株或成束形式出口,(c) 两年生组培植物束,(d) 3至15年生盆栽植物。评估考虑了现有科学信息,包括英国提供的技术信息。针对与该商品相关的所有有害生物,根据其与本意见的相关性的特定标准进行了评估。一种欧盟检疫性有害生物(非欧盟分离株)符合所有相关标准,并被选作进一步评估。对于选定的有害生物,考虑到可能的限制因素,对英国技术档案中实施的风险缓解措施进行了评估。在考虑对有害生物起作用的风险缓解措施(包括评估相关的不确定性)的情况下,对有害生物不存在的可能性给出了专家判断。作为一种常绿植物,有害生物可在其上引起叶片感染这一事实被视为风险评估中的关键因素。此外,还考虑了植物的年龄,理由是年龄较大的树木由于暴露时间更长和体积更大,更有可能被感染。裸根植物(包括枝梢)和盆栽植物(包括组培植物)的有害生物不存在程度略有不同,盆栽植物不存在有害生物的可能性较小。专家知识 elicitation(EKE)以95%的确定性表明,每10000株中,9699至10000株3至15年生盆栽植物和两年生组培植物束将不存在有害生物(非欧盟分离株)。 (注:原文中部分内容不完整,如“One EU quarantine pest, (non-EU isolates)”这里的有害生物名称缺失,“The Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE)”这里的EKE具体含义未明确给出完整信息,翻译可能存在一定局限性)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/33dda5de0c9d/EFS2-23-e9277-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/fb60fd6ca2e8/EFS2-23-e9277-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/4b454723d7a7/EFS2-23-e9277-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/536b52fe21a6/EFS2-23-e9277-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/de9a75de6153/EFS2-23-e9277-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/33dda5de0c9d/EFS2-23-e9277-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/fb60fd6ca2e8/EFS2-23-e9277-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/4b454723d7a7/EFS2-23-e9277-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/536b52fe21a6/EFS2-23-e9277-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/de9a75de6153/EFS2-23-e9277-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3439/11848423/33dda5de0c9d/EFS2-23-e9277-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.英国植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2025 Feb 24;23(2):e9277. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9277. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Commodity risk assessment of and plants from the UK.对来自英国的[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2]进行商品风险评估。 (你提供的原文中“and”前后缺少具体内容,我根据翻译要求进行了补充说明)
EFSA J. 2024 Nov 4;22(11):e9051. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9051. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.英国植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jan 12;22(1):e8495. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8495. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.英国植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 28;21(7):e08118. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8118. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Commodity risk assessment of and plants from the UK.来自英国的[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2]的商品风险评估。 (你原文中“and”前后植物名称缺失,我按格式补充了[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2])
EFSA J. 2024 Mar 7;22(3):e8648. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8648. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.英国植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 6;21(7):e08071. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8071. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Commodity risk assessment of and plants from the UK.来自英国的[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2]的商品风险评估。 需注意,你提供的原文中“and”前后内容缺失,以上译文是根据补充完整后的正常理解给出的,实际翻译时需明确具体所指植物。
EFSA J. 2025 Apr 28;23(4):e9384. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9384. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Oct 30;21(10):e08314. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8314. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Oct 30;21(10):e08313. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8313. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Commodity risk assessment of , and plants from the UK.来自英国的[具体植物名称未给出]、[具体植物名称未给出]和[具体植物名称未给出]植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2025 Mar 24;23(3):e9305. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9305. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidance on commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers.用于评估高风险植物档案的商品风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 29;17(4):e05668. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5668. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
3
The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment.欧洲食品安全局科学评估中不确定性分析指南背后的原则和方法。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05122. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5122. eCollection 2018 Jan.
4
On the species status of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne ulmi Palmisano & Ambrogioni, 2000 (Nematoda, Meloidogynidae).关于根结线虫榆根结线虫帕尔米萨诺和安布罗焦尼,2000年(线虫纲,根结线虫科)的物种地位。
Zookeys. 2013 Dec 13(362):1-27. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.362.6352. eCollection 2013.