Barsha Rifath Ara Alam, Najand Babak, Zare Hossein, Assari Shervin
School of Community Health & Policy, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marginalization Related Diminished returns, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Ment Health Clin Psychol. 2024;8(1):16-25. doi: 10.29245/2578-2959/2024/1.1299. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
Although educational attainment is a major social determinant of health, according to Marginalization-related Diminished Returns (MDRs), the effect of education tends to be weaker for marginalized groups compared to the privileged groups. While we know more about marginalization due to race and ethnicity, limited information is available on MDRs of educational attainment among US immigrant individuals.
This study compared immigrant and non-immigrant US adults aged 18 and over for the effects of educational attainment on subjective health (self-rated health; SRH).
Data came from General Social Survey (GSS) that recruited a nationally representative sample of US adults from 1972 to 2022. Overall, GSS has enrolled 45,043 individuals who were either immigrant (4,247; 9.4%) and non-immigrant (40,796; 90.6%). The independent variable was educational attainment, the dependent variable was SRH (measured with a single item), confounders were age, gender, race, employment and marital status, and moderator was immigration (nativity) status.
Higher educational attainment was associated with higher odds of good SRH (odds ratio OR = 2.08 for 12 years of education, OR = 2.81 for 13-15 years of education, OR = 4.38 for college graduation, and OR = 4.83 for graduate studies). However, we found significant statistical interaction between immigration status and college graduation on SRH, which was indicative of smaller association between college graduation and SRH for immigrant than non-immigrant US adults.
In line with MDRs, the association between educational attainment and SRH was weaker for immigrant than non-immigrant. It is essential to implement two sets of policies to achieve health inequalities among immigrant populations: policies that increase educational attainment of immigrants and those that increase the health returns of educational attainment for immigrants.
尽管受教育程度是健康的主要社会决定因素,但根据与边缘化相关的收益递减(MDRs)理论,与特权群体相比,教育对边缘化群体的影响往往较弱。虽然我们对种族和族裔导致的边缘化了解较多,但关于美国移民个体受教育程度的MDRs的信息有限。
本研究比较了18岁及以上的美国移民和非移民成年人受教育程度对主观健康(自评健康;SRH)的影响。
数据来自综合社会调查(GSS),该调查从1972年至2022年招募了具有全国代表性的美国成年人样本。总体而言,GSS共纳入了45,043人,其中移民4,247人(9.4%),非移民40,796人(90.6%)。自变量是受教育程度,因变量是SRH(用单个项目测量),混杂因素是年龄、性别、种族、就业和婚姻状况,调节变量是移民(出生地)状况。
受教育程度越高,SRH良好的几率越高(12年教育的优势比OR = 2.08,13 - 15年教育的OR = 2.81,大学毕业的OR = 4.38,研究生学习的OR = 4.83)。然而,我们发现移民身份和大学毕业对SRH存在显著的统计交互作用,这表明与非移民美国成年人相比,移民中大学毕业与SRH之间的关联较小。
与MDRs一致,移民中受教育程度与SRH之间的关联比非移民弱。为了实现移民群体中的健康不平等,实施两套政策至关重要:提高移民受教育程度的政策和提高移民教育程度健康回报的政策。