Veldhuis Nienke, Nuijts Myrthe A, Isphording Luka, Lee-Kong Felicia V Y L, Imhof Saskia M, Stegeman Inge
Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Front Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 31;2:961996. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2022.961996. eCollection 2022.
To evaluate the prevalence, type and extent of linguistic spin in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring interventions in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), as well as to investigate whether study variables were correlated with linguistic spin.
PubMed was searched from 2011 to 2020 to identify RCTs including patients with AMD. Two authors independently assessed a total of 96 RCTs. Linear regression analyses were performed to investigate whether linguistic spin was correlated with predefined study variables.
Linguistic spin was found in 61 of 96 abstracts (63.5%) and in 90 of 96 main texts (93.8%). Use of words pointing out the beneficial effect of a treatment and the use of '(statistically) significant/significance' without reporting a -value or a 95% confidence interval (CI) were the most frequently identified categories of linguistic spin. Sample size was significantly correlated with the total linguistic spin score (95% CI 0.38-5.23, = 0.02).
A high prevalence and extent of linguistic spin in RCTs about AMD was found. We highlighted the importance of objective reporting and awareness of linguistic spin among ophthalmologists and other readers.
评估探索年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)中语言倾向性的患病率、类型和程度,并调查研究变量是否与语言倾向性相关。
检索2011年至2020年期间的PubMed,以识别纳入AMD患者的RCT。两位作者独立评估了总共96项RCT。进行线性回归分析以调查语言倾向性是否与预先定义的研究变量相关。
96篇摘要中有61篇(63.5%)和96篇正文中有90篇(93.8%)存在语言倾向性。指出治疗有益效果的词汇使用以及在未报告P值或95%置信区间(CI)的情况下使用“(统计学)显著/显著性”是最常识别出的语言倾向性类别。样本量与总的语言倾向性评分显著相关(95%CI 0.38 - 5.23,P = 0.02)。
发现关于AMD的RCT中语言倾向性的患病率和程度较高。我们强调了客观报告以及眼科医生和其他读者对语言倾向性的认识的重要性。