Okazawa Yuki, Kataoka Yuki, Shindo Kazuo
Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, JPN.
Department of Anesthesia, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Amagasaki, JPN.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 5;16(2):e53661. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53661. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Background Transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension (PtcCO) measurement is a promising alternative to arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO) measurement. PaCO measurement is invasive and intermittent, whereas PtcCO measurement is non-invasive and continuous. However, previous studies evaluating PtcCOmeasurements did not include patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), who experience anticipated hemodynamic changes, particularly before and after valve placement. Therefore, we investigated whether PtcCO measurement could provide an alternative to PaCO measurement during transfemoral TAVR under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with local anesthesia. Methodology We conducted a prospective observational study. We included all consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who were scheduled to undergo a transfemoral TAVR under MAC at our institution from November 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021. During the procedures, PaCO and PtcCO were concurrently monitored six times as a reference standard and index test, respectively. PtcCO was monitored continuously using a non-invasive earlobe sensor. The agreement between PtcCO and PaCO measurements was assessed using the Bland-Altman method, and the 95% limits of agreement were calculated. Based on previous studies, we determined that 95% limits of agreement of ±6.0 mmHg would be clinically acceptable to define PtcCO as an alternative to PaCO. Results We obtained 88 measurement pairs from 15 patients. The lower and upper 95% limits of agreement between the PtcCO and PaCO measurements were -4.22 mmHg and 6.56 mmHg, respectively. Conclusions During TAVR under MAC with local anesthesia, PtcCO measurement could not provide a viable alternative to PaCO measurement to reduce high PaCO2 events. This study focused on comparing intraoperative periods before and after valve implantation. Therefore, further investigation is warranted to assess the impact of various factors, including the prosthetic valve type and the hemodynamic effects of balloon aortic valvuloplasty, on PtcCO measurement in TAVR.
背景 经皮二氧化碳分压(PtcCO)测量是动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO)测量的一种有前景的替代方法。PaCO测量具有侵入性且是间歇性的,而PtcCO测量是非侵入性且连续的。然而,先前评估PtcCO测量的研究未纳入接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者,这些患者会经历预期的血流动力学变化,尤其是在瓣膜置入前后。因此,我们调查了在局部麻醉监护麻醉(MAC)下经股动脉TAVR期间,PtcCO测量是否可以替代PaCO测量。
方法 我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究。纳入了2020年11月1日至2021年4月30日期间在我院计划接受MAC下经股动脉TAVR的所有连续性重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者。在手术过程中,分别将PaCO和PtcCO作为参考标准和指标测试同时监测6次。使用非侵入性耳垂传感器连续监测PtcCO。采用Bland-Altman方法评估PtcCO和PaCO测量之间的一致性,并计算95%一致性界限。基于先前的研究,我们确定将PtcCO定义为PaCO的替代方法时,95%一致性界限为±6.0 mmHg在临床上是可接受的。
结果 我们从15例患者中获得了88对测量值。PtcCO和PaCO测量之间的95%一致性界限下限和上限分别为-4.22 mmHg和6.56 mmHg。
结论 在局部麻醉MAC下的TAVR期间,PtcCO测量不能为减少高PaCO2事件提供可行的替代PaCO测量的方法。本研究重点比较了瓣膜植入前后的手术期。因此,有必要进一步研究评估包括人工瓣膜类型和球囊主动脉瓣成形术的血流动力学效应等各种因素对TAVR中PtcCO测量的影响。