Suppr超能文献

经皮二氧化碳监测在非插管患者呼吸衰竭监测中优于呼气末二氧化碳监测:一项初步研究。

Superiority of transcutaneous CO2 over end-tidal CO2 measurement for monitoring respiratory failure in nonintubated patients: A pilot study.

作者信息

Lermuzeaux Mathilde, Meric Henri, Sauneuf Bertrand, Girard Salomé, Normand Hervé, Lofaso Frédéric, Terzi Nicolas

机构信息

Service de Réanimation Médicale, Caen, F-14000, France.

Centre d'Investigation Clinique-Innovations Technologiques, Services de Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP; E.A. 4497, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin en Yvelines, 92380, Garches, France.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Arterial blood gas measurement is frequently performed in critically ill patients to diagnose and monitor acute respiratory failure. At a given metabolic rate, carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) is entirely determined by CO2 elimination through ventilation. Transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PtcCO2) monitoring permits a noninvasive and continuous estimation of arterial CO2 tension (PaCO2). The accuracy of PtcCO2, however, has not been well studied. To assess the accuracy of different CO2 monitoring methods, we compared PtcCO2 and end-tidal CO2 concentration (EtCO2) to PaCO2 measurements in nonintubated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute respiratory failure.

METHODS

During a 2-month period, we conducted a prospective observational cohort study in 25 consecutive nonintubated and spontaneously breathing patients admitted to our ICU. Arterial blood gases were measured at study inclusion, 30, 60, and 120 minutes later. At each sampling time, EtCO2 was continuously monitored using a Philips Smart Capnoline Plus, and PtcCO2 was measured using was measured using SenTec device. The aim of the study was to assess agreement between PtcCO2 and PaCO2 and between EtCO2 and PaCO2 in nonintubated ICU patients with acute respiratory failure. Bland-Altman techniques and Pearson correlation coefficients were used. The differences over time (at 30, 60, and 120 minutes) between PaCO2 and EtCO2 and between PtcCO2 and PaCO2 were evaluated using 1-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide and PaCO2 were well correlated (R = 0.97), whereas the correlation between EtCO2 and PaCO2 was poor (R = 0.62) probably due to the presence of an alveolar dead space in a few patients, most notably in the group with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The difference over time remained stable for both PaCO2 vs EtCO2 (analysis of variance; P = .88) and PaCO2 vs PtcCO2 (P = .93).

CONCLUSION

We found large differences between EtCO2 and Paco2 in spontaneously breathing nonintubated ICU patients admitted for acute respiratory failure. Our study argues against the use of EtCO2 monitoring in such patients but raises the possibility that PtcCO2 measurement may provide reasonable estimates of PaCO2.

摘要

目的

在危重症患者中经常进行动脉血气测量以诊断和监测急性呼吸衰竭。在给定的代谢率下,二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)完全由通气时的二氧化碳排出量决定。经皮二氧化碳分压(PtcCO2)监测可对动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)进行无创且连续的评估。然而,PtcCO2的准确性尚未得到充分研究。为评估不同二氧化碳监测方法的准确性,我们在患有急性呼吸衰竭的非插管重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,将PtcCO2和呼气末二氧化碳浓度(EtCO2)与PaCO2测量值进行了比较。

方法

在为期2个月的时间里,我们对连续入住我院ICU的25例非插管且自主呼吸的患者进行了一项前瞻性观察队列研究。在研究纳入时、30分钟、60分钟和120分钟后测量动脉血气。在每个采样时间,使用飞利浦Smart Capnoline Plus连续监测EtCO2,并使用SenTec设备测量PtcCO2。本研究的目的是评估患有急性呼吸衰竭的非插管ICU患者中PtcCO2与PaCO2之间以及EtCO2与PaCO2之间的一致性。采用Bland-Altman技术和Pearson相关系数。使用单向方差分析评估PaCO2与EtCO2之间以及PtcCO2与PaCO2之间随时间(30分钟、60分钟和120分钟)的差异。

结果

经皮二氧化碳分压与PaCO2相关性良好(R = 0.97),而EtCO2与PaCO2之间的相关性较差(R = 0.62),这可能是由于部分患者存在肺泡死腔,最明显的是在慢性阻塞性肺疾病组。PaCO2与EtCO2之间以及PaCO2与PtcCO2之间随时间的差异均保持稳定(方差分析;PaCO2与EtCO2比较,P = 0.88;PaCO2与PtcCO2比较,P = 0.93)。

结论

我们发现在因急性呼吸衰竭入院的自主呼吸非插管ICU患者中,EtCO2与Paco2之间存在较大差异。我们的研究不支持在此类患者中使用EtCO2监测,但提出了PtcCO2测量可能为PaCO2提供合理估计值的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验