Liang Zhide, Tian Shudong, Wang Chuanzhi, Zhang Meng, Guo Hengzhi, Yu Yingdanni, Wang Xianliang
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2024 May;54(5):315-327. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12153.
To quantify the dose-response relationship between overall and specific exercise modalities and pain, in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (LBP). Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis. We searched the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases from inception to June 2023. We included randomized controlled trials of exercise interventions in adults with nonspecific chronic LBP and at least 1 pain outcome reported at the main trial end point. A random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0, and used the GRADE approach to judge the certainty of evidence for each outcome. Eighty-two trials were included (n = 5033 participants). We found a nonlinear dose-response relationship between total exercise and pain in patients with nonspecific chronic LBP. The maximum significant response was observed at 920 MET minutes (standardized mean difference = -1.74; 95% credible intervals: -2.43, -1.04). The minimal clinically important difference for achieving meaningful pain improvement was 520 MET minutes per week. The dose to achieve minimal clinically important difference varied by type of exercise; Pilates was the most effective. The certainty of the evidence was very low to moderate for all outcomes. The dose-response relationship of different exercise modalities to improve pain in patients with nonspecific chronic LBP had a U-shaped trajectory and low- to moderate-certainty evidence. The clinical effect was most pronounced with Pilates exercise. .
为了量化非特异性慢性下腰痛(LBP)患者整体和特定运动方式与疼痛之间的剂量反应关系。采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析进行系统评价。我们检索了从数据库建立至2023年6月的Medline、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus和SPORTDiscus数据库。我们纳入了针对非特异性慢性LBP成人的运动干预随机对照试验,且主要试验终点至少报告了1项疼痛结局。进行了随机效应网络荟萃分析。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具2.0评估偏倚风险,并采用GRADE方法判断每个结局的证据确定性。纳入了82项试验(n = 5033名参与者)。我们发现非特异性慢性LBP患者的总运动量与疼痛之间存在非线性剂量反应关系。在920代谢当量分钟时观察到最大显著反应(标准化均值差 = -1.74;95%可信区间:-2.43,-1.04)。实现有意义的疼痛改善的最小临床重要差异为每周520代谢当量分钟。达到最小临床重要差异的剂量因运动类型而异;普拉提最有效。所有结局的证据确定性为非常低至中等。不同运动方式改善非特异性慢性LBP患者疼痛的剂量反应关系呈U形轨迹,证据确定性为低至中等。普拉提运动的临床效果最为显著。