Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0298552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298552. eCollection 2024.
High-quality implementation evaluations report on intervention fidelity and adaptations made, but a practical process for evaluating implementation strategies is needed. A retrospective method for evaluating implementation strategies is also required as prospective methods can be resource intensive. This study aimed to establish an implementation strategy postmortem method to identify the implementation strategies used, when, and their perceived importance. We used the rural Transitions Nurse Program (TNP) as a case study, a national care coordination intervention implemented at 11 hospitals over three years.
The postmortem used a retrospective, mixed method, phased approach. Implementation team and front-line staff characterized the implementation strategies used, their timing, frequency, ease of use, and their importance to implementation success. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation, the Quality Enhancement Research Initiative phases, and Proctor and colleagues' guidance were used to operationalize the strategies. Survey data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed using matrix content analysis.
The postmortem method identified 45 of 73 ERIC strategies introduced, including 41 during pre-implementation, 37 during implementation, and 27 during sustainment. External facilitation, centralized technical assistance, and clinical supervision were ranked as the most important and frequently used strategies. Implementation strategies were more intensively applied in the beginning of the study and tapered over time.
The postmortem method identified that more strategies were used in TNP than planned and identified the most important strategies from the perspective of the implementation team and front-line staff. The findings can inform other implementation studies as well as dissemination of the TNP intervention.
高质量的实施评估报告干预的保真度和所做的调整,但需要一种实用的方法来评估实施策略。由于前瞻性方法可能需要大量资源,因此还需要一种回顾性的方法来评估实施策略。本研究旨在建立一种实施策略事后评估方法,以确定所使用的实施策略、使用时间及其感知重要性。我们使用农村过渡护士计划(TNP)作为案例研究,这是一项在三年内在 11 家医院实施的全国性护理协调干预措施。
事后评估采用回顾性、混合方法、分阶段的方法。实施团队和一线工作人员描述了所使用的实施策略、其时间、频率、易用性及其对实施成功的重要性。实施变更的专家建议(ERIC)汇编、质量增强研究倡议阶段以及 Proctor 等人的指导被用来实施这些策略。调查数据进行描述性分析,定性数据采用矩阵内容分析进行分析。
事后评估方法确定了 73 项 ERIC 策略中的 45 项,其中 41 项在实施前,37 项在实施中,27 项在维持中。外部促进、集中技术援助和临床监督被评为最重要和最常用的策略。实施策略在研究开始时应用更为密集,随着时间的推移逐渐减少。
事后评估方法确定了 TNP 中使用的策略比计划中的更多,并从实施团队和一线工作人员的角度确定了最重要的策略。这些发现可以为其他实施研究以及 TNP 干预措施的传播提供信息。