University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, Rochester, NY; and.
OrthoIndy Trauma, St. Vincent Trauma Center, St. Vincent Orthopaedics and Spine Center, Indianapolis, IN.
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):214-219. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002796.
To test the hypothesis that primary osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures may lead to more favorable clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes than fixation following a trial of nonoperative management.
Retrospective cohort review.
Academic level I trauma center.
Adult patients who presented with humeral shaft fractures and ultimately underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) from May 2011 to May 2021. Patients who underwent ORIF within 2 weeks of injury were grouped into the primary osteosynthesis cohort, and patients who underwent ORIF >4 weeks from the date of injury were grouped into the trial of nonoperative cohort.
Postoperative complications, elbow arc of motion, time to radiographic union, and patient-reported outcomes were investigated and compared between the primary osteosynthesis and trial of nonoperative management cohorts.
One hundred twenty-seven patients fit the study criteria, 84 underwent primary osteosynthesis and 43 trialed initial nonoperative treatment. No differences were found in patient demographics between the primary osteosynthesis and trial of nonoperative management cohorts, including age (53 ± 19 vs. 57 ± 18; P = 0.25), sex (39% vs. 44% male, 61% vs. 56% female; P = 0.70), and Body Mass Index (BMI) (30 ± 6 vs. 32 ± 9; P = 0.38). The average time to operative intervention in the primary osteosynthesis group was 4 days (0-14 days) and 105 days (28-332 days) in the trial of nonoperative treatment group ( P < 0.01). No differences were found with regard to intraoperative blood loss, total operative time, time to radiographic union (determined using the Radiographic Union Scores for Humeral scoring system), or overall complication rates, including primary and secondary radial nerve injuries ( P = 0.23 and 0.86, respectively). Patients reported similar patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pain interference ( P = 0.73), depression (D) ( P = 0.99), and physical function ( P = 0.66) scores at their 6-month postsurgical follow-up visits.
Patients who attempted a trial of nonoperative management for humeral shaft fractures before ORIF had similar clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes as those who underwent primary osteosynthesis.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
验证以下假设,即与非手术治疗尝试后行内固定相比,肱骨干骨折的初次骨内固定可能会带来更有利的临床、功能和患者报告的结果。
回顾性队列研究。
学术一级创伤中心。
2011 年 5 月至 2021 年 5 月期间出现肱骨干骨折并最终接受切开复位内固定(ORIF)的成年患者。受伤后 2 周内行 ORIF 的患者被归入初次骨内固定组,受伤后 4 周以上行 ORIF 的患者被归入非手术治疗尝试组。
研究比较了初次骨内固定和非手术治疗尝试两组之间的术后并发症、肘活动弧、影像学愈合时间和患者报告的结果。
127 名患者符合研究标准,其中 84 名接受了初次骨内固定,43 名尝试了初始非手术治疗。初次骨内固定和非手术治疗尝试两组患者的人口统计学特征无差异,包括年龄(53±19 岁比 57±18 岁;P=0.25)、性别(39%比 44%为男性,61%比 56%为女性;P=0.70)和体重指数(BMI)(30±6 比 32±9;P=0.38)。初次骨内固定组的平均手术干预时间为 4 天(0-14 天),非手术治疗组为 105 天(28-332 天)(P<0.01)。术中失血量、总手术时间、影像学愈合时间(使用肱骨干评分系统的影像学愈合评分确定)以及总体并发症发生率(包括原发性和继发性桡神经损伤)均无差异(P=0.23 和 0.86,分别)。患者在术后 6 个月的随访中报告了类似的患者报告的测量信息系统疼痛干扰(P=0.73)、抑郁(D)(P=0.99)和躯体功能(P=0.66)评分。
与接受初次骨内固定的患者相比,尝试非手术治疗肱骨干骨折后再行 ORIF 的患者具有相似的临床、功能和患者报告的结果。
治疗 III 级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。