• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《COVID-19 大流行期间在大多伦多地区实施的“无接触”堕胎计划的安全性和有效性》。

The Safety and Efficacy of a "No Touch" Abortion Program Implemented in the Greater Toronto Area During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 Jun;46(6):102429. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102429. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102429
PMID:38458271
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of first-trimester "No Touch" medication abortion programs at 2 clinics in Toronto, Ontario during their early implementation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients who underwent virtual consultation for mifepristone-misoprostol medication abortion between April 2020-August 2022 at 2 reproductive health clinics. In response to the pandemic, "No Touch" abortion protocols have been developed that align with the Canadian Protocol for the Provision of Medical Abortion via Telemedicine. Records were reviewed for demographic information, clinical course, investigations required, confirmation of complete abortion and adverse events. The primary outcome was complete medication abortion, defined as expulsion of the pregnancy without requiring uterine aspiration.

RESULTS

A total of 277 patients had abortions initiated in the "No Touch" or "Low Touch" care pathways and had sufficient follow-up to determine outcomes. Of these patients, 92.8% (95% CI 89.7%-95.8%) had a complete medication abortion (n = 257) and 76.1% (n = 159) remained "No Touch" throughout their care. Investigations were performed for 102 participants before or after their abortion, classifying them as "Low Touch". Nineteen patients (6.9%) underwent uterine aspiration. The rate of adverse events was low, with 1 case of a missed ectopic pregnancy and 1 patient requiring hospitalization for endometritis.

CONCLUSIONS

"No Touch" provision of mifepristone-misoprostol medication abortion care was safe and effective with outcomes comparable to previous studies. These results provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of a "No Touch" approach in the Canadian context, which has the potential to reduce barriers to accessing abortion care.

摘要

目的

评估安大略省多伦多的 2 家诊所应对 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的早期第一孕期“无接触”药物流产计划的安全性和有效性。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2020 年 4 月至 2022 年 8 月期间在 2 家生殖健康诊所接受米非司酮-米索前列醇药物流产虚拟咨询的所有患者。为应对大流行,制定了“无接触”流产方案,这些方案符合加拿大通过远程医疗提供药物流产的方案。对记录进行了回顾,以获取人口统计学信息、临床经过、所需检查、完全流产的确认和不良事件。主要结局为完全药物流产,定义为妊娠物排出而无需子宫抽吸。

结果

共有 277 名患者在“无接触”或“低接触”护理途径下开始流产,并进行了足够的随访以确定结局。这些患者中,92.8%(95%置信区间 89.7%-95.8%)有完全药物流产(n=257),76.1%(n=159)在整个护理过程中保持“无接触”。102 名患者在流产前或后进行了检查,将其归类为“低接触”。19 名患者(6.9%)接受了子宫抽吸。不良事件发生率较低,1 例漏诊宫外孕,1 例患者因子宫内膜炎住院。

结论

米非司酮-米索前列醇药物流产护理的“无接触”提供是安全有效的,结局与既往研究相当。这些结果为加拿大“无接触”方法的有效性和安全性提供了证据,这有可能减少获得堕胎护理的障碍。

相似文献

1
The Safety and Efficacy of a "No Touch" Abortion Program Implemented in the Greater Toronto Area During the COVID-19 Pandemic.《COVID-19 大流行期间在大多伦多地区实施的“无接触”堕胎计划的安全性和有效性》。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 Jun;46(6):102429. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102429. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
2
Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.流产管理方法:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.
3
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.孕早期人工流产的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub4.
4
Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion.孕早期人工流产的宫颈准备
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17(2):CD007207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007207.pub2.
5
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.孕早期人工流产的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub3.
6
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.孕早期人工流产的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub2.
7
Surgical versus medical methods for second-trimester induced abortion.孕中期人工流产的手术方法与药物方法对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 8;7:CD006714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006714.pub3.
8
Cervical preparation for dilation and evacuation at 12 to 24 weeks gestation.妊娠12至24周时扩张和清宫术的宫颈准备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 3;3(3):CD007310. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007310.pub3.
9
The use of telemedicine services for medical abortion.远程医疗服务在药物流产中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 4;6(6):CD013764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013764.pub2.
10
Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.孕中期终止妊娠的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD005216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005216.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and contraceptive practices among Chinese women seeking abortion: a multicentre, descriptive study from 2019 to 2021.2019 年至 2021 年多中心描述性研究:中国寻求堕胎女性的特征和避孕措施。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Oct 15;50(4):252-261. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202181.