• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急性上消化道出血内镜治疗中达到熟练程度的学习曲线:需要多少经验?

Learning curve of achieving competency in emergency endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: how much experience is necessary?

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 7;11(1):e001281. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001281.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001281
PMID:38458629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10921515/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) has seen rapid advancements with revolutionising innovations. However, insufficient data exist on the necessary number of emergency endoscopies needed to achieve competency in haemostatic interventions.

DESIGN

We retrospectively analysed all oesophagogastroduodenoscopies with signs of recent haemorrhage performed between 2015 and 2022 at our university hospital. A learning curve was created by plotting the number of previously performed oesophagogastroduodenoscopies with signs of recent haemorrhage against the treatment failure rate, defined as failed haemostasis, rebleeding and necessary surgical or radiological intervention.

RESULTS

The study population included 787 cases with a median age of 66 years. Active bleeding was detected in 576 cases (73.2%). Treatment failure occurred in 225 (28.6%) cases. The learning curve showed a marked decline in treatment failure rates after nine oesophagogastroduodenoscopies had been performed by the respective endoscopists followed by a first plateau between 20 and 50 procedures. A second decline was observed after 51 emergency procedures followed by a second plateau. Endoscopists with experience of <10 emergency procedures had higher treatment failure rates compared with endoscopists with >51 emergency oesophagogastroduodenoscopies performed (p=0.039) or consultants (p=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that a minimum number of 20 oesophagogastroduodenoscopies with signs of recent haemorrhage is necessary before endoscopists should be considered proficient to perform emergency procedures independently. Endoscopists might be considered as advanced-qualified experts in managing UGIB after a minimum of 50 haemostatic procedure performed. Implementing recommendations on minimum numbers of emergency endoscopies in education programmes of endoscopy trainees could improve their confidence and competency in managing acute UGIB.

摘要

目的

上消化道出血(UGIB)的治疗已经有了快速的发展和革命性的创新。然而,对于实现止血干预能力所需的紧急内镜检查数量,目前还缺乏足够的数据。

设计

我们回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2022 年期间在我们大学医院进行的所有有近期出血迹象的食管胃十二指肠镜检查。通过绘制有近期出血迹象的食管胃十二指肠镜检查数量与治疗失败率(定义为止血失败、再出血和必要的手术或放射学干预)的关系曲线,创建了一个学习曲线。

结果

研究人群包括 787 例中位年龄为 66 岁的患者。576 例(73.2%)检测到活动性出血。225 例(28.6%)发生治疗失败。学习曲线显示,在相应内镜医生进行了 9 例食管胃十二指肠镜检查后,治疗失败率显著下降,随后在 20 至 50 例之间出现第一个平台。在进行了 51 例紧急手术之后,观察到第二个下降,随后出现第二个平台。与经验超过 51 例紧急食管胃十二指肠镜检查或顾问医生相比,经验<10 例紧急手术的内镜医生治疗失败率更高(p=0.039)。

结论

我们的数据表明,内镜医生在独立进行紧急手术之前,至少需要进行 20 例有近期出血迹象的食管胃十二指肠镜检查,才能被认为有能力胜任。在进行了至少 50 例止血手术之后,内镜医生可能被认为是管理 UGIB 的高级专家。在内镜培训生的教育项目中实施关于紧急内镜检查最低数量的建议,可以提高他们管理急性 UGIB 的信心和能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce7/10921515/a4b654d24eeb/bmjgast-2023-001281f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce7/10921515/c6cef38a107b/bmjgast-2023-001281f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce7/10921515/2f04779ce967/bmjgast-2023-001281f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce7/10921515/8bad371ea71a/bmjgast-2023-001281f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce7/10921515/a4b654d24eeb/bmjgast-2023-001281f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce7/10921515/c6cef38a107b/bmjgast-2023-001281f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce7/10921515/2f04779ce967/bmjgast-2023-001281f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce7/10921515/8bad371ea71a/bmjgast-2023-001281f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce7/10921515/a4b654d24eeb/bmjgast-2023-001281f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning curve of achieving competency in emergency endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: how much experience is necessary?在急性上消化道出血内镜治疗中达到熟练程度的学习曲线:需要多少经验?
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 7;11(1):e001281. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001281.
2
Outcomes and Role of Urgent Endoscopy in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nonvariceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding.高危急性非静脉曲张性胃肠出血患者行急诊内镜检查的结果和作用。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;16(3):370-377. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.029. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
Prediction of the need for emergency endoscopic treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and new score model: a retrospective study.预测上消化道出血需要紧急内镜治疗的新评分模型:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02413-8.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Sedation During Emergency Endoscopy for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.镇静在急性上消化道出血内镜治疗中的安全性和有效性:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr;68(4):1426-1434. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07740-0. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
5
Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients.急性胃肠道出血的紧急内镜检查:内镜止血和 AIMS65 评分在日本患者中的预后价值。
Dig Endosc. 2014 May;26(3):369-76. doi: 10.1111/den.12187. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
6
A Novel Hemostatic Peptide Solution for Common Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diseases: First Case Series Study on the Treatment Results of Endoscopic Hemostasis by Nonexpert Endoscopists.一种新型止血肽溶液治疗常见急性胃肠道出血疾病:非专家内镜医师内镜止血治疗效果的首例病例系列研究。
Dig Dis. 2024;42(1):94-101. doi: 10.1159/000535008. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
7
Derivation and validation of a novel risk score to predict need for haemostatic intervention in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (London Haemostat Score).一种新型风险评分模型用于预测急性上消化道出血(伦敦止血评分)患者需要止血干预的效果:推导和验证。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001008.
8
Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.针对胃肠内镜检查专业学员的虚拟现实模拟培训
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub3.
9
Differences in emergency endoscopy outcomes according to gastrointestinal bleeding location.根据胃肠道出血部位的不同,急诊内镜检查结果存在差异。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan;56(1):86-93. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1847316. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
10
[Upper gastrointestinal bleeding - Review of our ten years results].[上消化道出血——我们十年结果的回顾]
Zentralbl Chir. 2001 Oct;126(10):772-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18265.

本文引用的文献

1
Hemostatic Powder vs Standard Endoscopic Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor Bleeding: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.止血粉与标准内镜治疗胃肠肿瘤出血的比较:一项多中心随机试验。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Sep;165(3):762-772.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.05.042. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
2
Efficacy of endoscopic therapy and long-term outcomes of upper gastrointestinal tumor bleeding in patients with esophageal cancer.内镜治疗对食管癌患者上消化道肿瘤出血的疗效及长期预后
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Dec;58(9):1064-1070. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2199439. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
3
MELD-Lactate Predicts Poor Outcome in Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis.
MELD-Lactate 预测肝硬化静脉曲张出血的不良预后。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Mar;68(3):1042-1050. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07744-w. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Over-the-scope-clips versus standard treatment in high-risk patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomised controlled trial (STING-2).经内镜套扎器止血夹与标准治疗在急性高危非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者中的对比:一项随机对照试验(STING-2)
Gut. 2022 Jul;71(7):1251-1258. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325300. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
Proton pump inhibitor treatment initiated prior to endoscopic diagnosis in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.质子泵抑制剂治疗在上消化道出血内镜诊断前开始。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 7;1(1):CD005415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005415.pub4.
6
Timing of endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a territory-wide cohort study.急性上消化道出血内镜检查时机:全港范围队列研究。
Gut. 2022 Aug;71(8):1544-1550. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323054. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
7
Letter: enhancing training opportunities for upper GI bleeding in Sheffield-a UK transferable model?信件:提升英国谢菲尔德上消化道出血的培训机会——一种可移植的模式?
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jun;53(11):1241-1242. doi: 10.1111/apt.16354.
8
ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding.ACG 临床指南:上消化道和溃疡出血。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):899-917. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245.
9
Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021.内镜诊断和非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(NVUGIH)的处理:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南 - 2021 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):300-332. doi: 10.1055/a-1369-5274. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
10
Variation in exposure to endoscopic haemostasis for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding during UK gastroenterology training.英国胃肠病学培训期间急性上消化道出血内镜止血治疗的暴露差异。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 18;11(6):436-440. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101351. eCollection 2020 Oct.