Siau Keith, Morris A John, Murugananthan Aravinth, McKaig Brian, Dunckley Paul
Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.
Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 18;11(6):436-440. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101351. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Gastroenterologists are typically expected to be competent in endoscopic haemostasis for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB), with the Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) often heralding the onset of participation in on-call AUGIB rotas. We analysed the volume of haemostasis experience recorded by gastroenterology CCT holders on the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Training System (JETS) e-portfolio, the UK electronic portfolio for endoscopy, and assessed for variations in exposure to haemostasis.
UK gastroenterologists awarded CCT between April 2014 and April 2017 were retrospectively identified from the specialist register. Credentials were cross-referenced with JETS to retrieve AUGIB haemostasis procedures prior to CCT. Procedures were collated according to variceal versus non-variceal therapies and compared across training deaneries.
Over the 3-year study period, 241 gastroenterologists were awarded CCT. 232 JETS e-portfolio users were included for analysis. In total, 12 932 haemostasis procedures were recorded, corresponding to a median of 42 (IQR 21-71) per gastroenterologist. Exposure to non-variceal modalities (median 28, IQR 15-52) was more frequent than variceal therapies (median 11, IQR 5-22; p<0.001). By procedure, adrenaline injection (median 12, IQR 6-23) and variceal band ligation (median 10, IQR 5-20) were most commonly recorded, whereas sclerotherapy experience was rare (median 0, IQR 0-1). Exposure to haemostasis did not differ by year of CCT (p=0.130) but varied significantly by deanery (p<0.001), with median procedures ranging from 20-126.
Exposure to AUGIB haemostasis during UK gastroenterology training varied across deaneries and procedural modalities which should prompt urgent locoregional review of access and delivery of training. Endoscopy departments should ensure the availability of supportive provisions in haemostasis (i.e. training/upskilling, supervision, mentorship) during the early post-CCT period.
通常期望胃肠病学家具备急性上消化道出血(AUGIB)内镜止血的能力,培训结业证书(CCT)往往标志着开始参与AUGIB的值班轮班。我们分析了胃肠病学CCT持有者在胃肠内镜培训系统联合咨询小组(JETS)电子档案(英国内镜电子档案)上记录的止血经验量,并评估了止血暴露的差异。
从专科注册名单中回顾性识别2014年4月至2017年4月期间获得CCT的英国胃肠病学家。将其资质与JETS交叉核对,以检索CCT之前的AUGIB止血程序。根据静脉曲张与非静脉曲张治疗对程序进行整理,并在各培训地区之间进行比较。
在3年的研究期间,241名胃肠病学家获得了CCT。纳入232名JETS电子档案用户进行分析。总共记录了12932例止血程序,每位胃肠病学家的中位数为42例(四分位间距21 - 71例)。非静脉曲张治疗方式的暴露(中位数28例,四分位间距15 - 52例)比静脉曲张治疗更频繁(中位数11例,四分位间距5 - 22例;p<0.001)。按程序而言,肾上腺素注射(中位数12例,四分位间距6 - 23例)和静脉曲张套扎术(中位数10例,四分位间距5 - 20例)记录最为常见,而硬化治疗经验很少(中位数0例,四分位间距0 - 1例)。止血暴露在获得CCT的年份之间没有差异(p = 0.130),但在各地区之间差异显著(p<0.001),中位数程序范围为20 - 126例。
英国胃肠病学培训期间AUGIB止血的暴露在各地区和程序方式上存在差异,这应促使对培训的获取和实施进行紧急的局部审查。内镜科室应确保在获得CCT后的早期阶段提供止血方面的支持性措施(即培训/技能提升、监督、指导)。