• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Landscape of Métis health and wellness: protocol for a scoping review.梅蒂斯人健康和保健状况概述:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e077868. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077868.
2
Elevating the uses of storytelling approaches within Indigenous health research: a critical and participatory scoping review protocol involving Indigenous people and settlers.提升故事叙述方法在原住民健康研究中的应用:一项涉及原住民和定居者的批判性和参与式范围综述协议。
Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01503-6.
3
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Indigenous perspectives on wellness and health in Canada: study protocol for a scoping review.加拿大原住民对健康和健康的看法:系统评价研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 11;9(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01428-0.
7
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
8
Protective and resilience factors to promote mental health among Indigenous youth in Canada: a scoping review protocol.促进加拿大原住民青年心理健康的保护和适应因素:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):e049285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049285.
9
Health and well-being needs of Indigenous adolescents: a protocol for a scoping review of qualitative studies.原住民青少年的健康和福祉需求:定性研究的范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 20;14(5):e079942. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079942.
10
Influence of social media and the digital environment on international migration of health workforce from low- and middle-income countries post COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review protocol.社交媒体和数字环境对 COVID-19 大流行后低中等收入国家卫生人力国际迁移的影响:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 17;14(10):e087213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087213.

本文引用的文献

1
Métis health in Canada: a scoping review of Métis-specific health literature.加拿大梅蒂斯人的健康:梅蒂斯人特定健康文献的范围综述。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Oct 3;11(5):E884-E893. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20230006. Print 2023 Sep-Oct.
2
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
3
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.评价系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明及其扩展的采用和影响:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;6(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8.
4
Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.进行系统范围综述的指南。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050.
5
Trends in Métis-related health research (1980-2009): identification of research gaps.1980 年至 2009 年间梅蒂斯人相关健康研究趋势:研究空白的识别。
Can J Public Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;103(1):23-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03404064.

梅蒂斯人健康和保健状况概述:系统评价方案。

Landscape of Métis health and wellness: protocol for a scoping review.

机构信息

Métis Nation of Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Department of Health, Society and Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e077868. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077868.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077868
PMID:38458778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10928757/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In Canada, Métis people are one of three distinct Indigenous peoples whose rights are recognised and affirmed in Section 35 of the federal . In line with Métis people having a unique culture, history, language and way of life, a distinctions-based approach is critical to understand the current landscape of Métis-specific health. In this paper, we present a scoping review protocol to describe this research landscape in Canada led by the Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This scoping review protocol is reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews reporting guidelines and follows Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology. We will search electronic databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Anthropology Plus, Bibliography of Indigenous Peoples of North America, Canadian Business and Current Affairs, Indigenous Studies Portal, Informit Indigenous Collection, Collaborative Indigenous Garden, PubMed, ProQuest), grey literature sources and reference lists from selected papers. Two reviewers (HMB and SK) will double-blind screen all titles/abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. Any health-related study or health report that includes a Métis-specific health, well-being or Métis social determinant of health outcome will be included. Relevant variables will be extracted following an iterative process whereby the data charting will be reviewed and updated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Findings from this scoping review will be shared back through the MNO's existing community-based communication channels. Traditional academic dissemination will also be pursued. Research ethics board approval is not required, since data are from peer-reviewed publications or publicly shared health reports and knowledge translation products.

摘要

简介

在加拿大,梅蒂斯人是三个独特的原住民群体之一,他们的权利在联邦宪法第 35 条中得到承认和肯定。鉴于梅蒂斯人拥有独特的文化、历史、语言和生活方式,基于区别的方法对于理解当前梅蒂斯特定健康状况至关重要。在本文中,我们提出了一个由安大略省梅蒂斯民族(MNO)领导的加拿大梅蒂斯特定健康研究领域的范围综述方案。

方法和分析

本范围综述方案是根据系统评价和元分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)报告指南以及阿克赛和奥马利的范围综述方法报告的。我们将搜索电子数据库(Scopus、MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL、APA PsycINFO、人类学加、北美原住民书目、加拿大商业和时事、原住民研究门户、信息原住民收藏、合作原住民花园、PubMed、ProQuest)、灰色文献来源和选定论文的参考文献列表。两名评审员(HMB 和 SK)将对所有标题/摘要和全文研究进行双盲筛选,以确定是否符合纳入标准。任何包含梅蒂斯特定健康、福祉或梅蒂斯社会健康决定因素结果的健康相关研究或健康报告都将被包括在内。将根据迭代过程提取相关变量,在此过程中,数据图表将进行审查和更新。

伦理和传播

本范围综述的结果将通过 MNO 现有的基于社区的沟通渠道反馈。也将寻求传统的学术传播。由于数据来自同行评议的出版物或公开分享的健康报告和知识转化产品,因此不需要研究伦理委员会的批准。