Suppr超能文献

试验报告的透明度和完整性:第 4 篇论文——使用常规电子记录进行的随机对照试验报告——有改进的空间。

Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 4 - reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using routinely collected electronic records - room for improvement.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Population Health, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Clinical Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Center for Research on Population and Health, American University of Beirut, Ras Beirut, Lebanon.

Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;141:198-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.011. Epub 2021 Sep 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe characteristics of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted using electronic health records (EHRs), including completeness and transparency of reporting assessed against the 2021 CONSORT Extension for RCTs Conducted Using Cohorts and Routinely Collected Data (CONSORT-ROUTINE) criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

MEDLINE and Cochrane Methodology Register were searched for a sample of RCTs published from 2011-2018. Completeness of reporting was assessed in a random sample using a pre-defined coding form.

RESULTS

Of the 183 RCT publications identified, 122 (67%) used EHRs to identify eligible participants, 139 (76%) used the EHR as part of the intervention and 137 (75%) to ascertain outcomes. When 60 publications were evaluated against the CONSORT 2010 item and the corresponding extension for the 8 modified items, four items were 'adequately reported' for most trials. Five new reporting items were identified for the CONSORT-ROUTINE extension; when evaluated, one was 'adequately reported', three were reported 'inadequately or not at all', the other 'partially'. There were, however, some encouraging signs with adequate and partial reporting of many important items, including descriptions of trial design, the consent process, outcome ascertainment and interpretation.

CONCLUSION

Aspects of RCTs using EHRs are sub-optimally reported. Uptake of the CONSORT-ROUTINE Extension may improve reporting.

摘要

目的

描述使用电子健康记录(EHR)进行的随机对照试验(RCT)的特点,包括根据 2021 年用于队列研究和常规收集数据的 RCT 的 CONSORT 扩展(CONSORT-ROUTINE)标准评估的报告的完整性和透明度。

研究设计

在 MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 方法学登记处搜索了 2011-2018 年发表的 RCT 样本。使用预先定义的编码表格对随机样本进行报告完整性评估。

结果

在确定的 183 篇 RCT 出版物中,122 篇(67%)使用 EHR 来确定合格参与者,139 篇(76%)将 EHR 作为干预的一部分使用,137 篇(75%)用于确定结局。当根据 CONSORT 2010 项目和 8 项修改项目的相应扩展评估 60 篇出版物时,大多数试验的 4 个项目“报告充分”。为 CONSORT-ROUTINE 扩展确定了 5 个新的报告项目;在评估时,一个项目“充分报告”,三个项目“报告不充分或根本没有”,另一个项目“部分报告”。然而,对于许多重要项目的充分和部分报告,包括试验设计、同意过程、结局确定和解释,都有一些令人鼓舞的迹象。

结论

使用 EHR 的 RCT 的某些方面报告不充分。采用 CONSORT-ROUTINE 扩展可能会提高报告质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5f8/8982641/fa985e93d195/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验