Suppr超能文献

在日本失眠患者中从 Z 药(右佐匹克隆、唑吡坦)和雷美尔通转换为仑替佐明的疗效和安全性:一项开放标签、多中心研究。

Efficacy and Safety of Transitioning to Lemborexant from Z-drug, Suvorexant, and Ramelteon in Japanese Insomnia Patients: An Open-label, Multicenter Study.

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume-shi, Fukuoka, Japan.

Hirota Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2024 Apr;41(4):1728-1745. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02811-2. Epub 2024 Mar 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For patients with chronic insomnia, conventional therapy may not always provide satisfactory efficacy and safety. Thus, switching to an alternative therapeutic agent can be explored. However, there is a lack of prospective studies evaluating the effectiveness of such changes. This prospective, non-randomized, open-label, interventional, multicenter study assessed whether Japanese patients with chronic insomnia dissatisfied with treatment could transition directly to lemborexant (LEM) from four cohorts-non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic (zolpidem, zopiclone, or eszopiclone) monotherapy, dual orexin receptor antagonist (suvorexant) monotherapy, suvorexant + benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs), and melatonin receptor agonist (ramelteon) combination. We evaluated whether transitioning to LEM improved patient satisfaction based on efficacy and safety.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was the proportion of successful transitions to LEM at 2 weeks (titration phase end), defined as the proportion of patients on LEM by the end of the 2-week titration phase who were willing to continue on LEM during the maintenance phase (Weeks 2-14). Patient satisfaction and safety (the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) were assessed at 14 weeks (end of titration and maintenance phases).

RESULTS

Among the 90 patients enrolled, 95.6% (95% confidence interval: 89.0-98.8%) successfully transitioned to LEM at 2 weeks. The proportions of patients who successfully continued on LEM were 97.8% and 82.2% at the end of the titration and maintenance phases (Weeks 2 and 14), respectively. The overall incidence of TEAEs was 47.8%; no serious TEAEs occurred. In all cohorts, the proportions of patients with positive responses were higher than the proportions with negative responses on the three scales of the Patient Global Impression-Insomnia version. During the maintenance phase, Insomnia Severity Index scores generally improved at Weeks 2, 6, and 14 of LEM transition.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct transition to LEM may be a valid treatment option for patients with insomnia who are dissatisfied with current treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04742699.

摘要

简介

对于慢性失眠症患者,常规治疗可能并不总能提供满意的疗效和安全性。因此,可以探索转换为替代治疗药物。然而,目前缺乏评估这种变化有效性的前瞻性研究。这项前瞻性、非随机、开放标签、干预性、多中心研究评估了对治疗不满意的慢性失眠症日本患者是否可以直接从四个队列(非苯二氮䓬类镇静催眠药[唑吡坦、佐匹克隆或右佐匹克隆]单药治疗、双重食欲素受体拮抗剂[苏沃雷生]单药治疗、苏沃雷生+苯二氮䓬受体激动剂[BZRAs]和褪黑素受体激动剂[雷美尔酮]联合治疗)转换为雷美替胺(LEM),从而提高患者的满意度,评估依据为疗效和安全性。

方法

主要终点是在 2 周(滴定阶段结束时)成功转换为 LEM 的比例,定义为在为期 2 周的滴定阶段结束时,愿意在维持阶段(第 2-14 周)继续使用 LEM 的患者比例。在第 14 周(滴定和维持阶段结束时)评估患者满意度和安全性(治疗出现的不良事件[TEAEs]发生率)。

结果

在纳入的 90 名患者中,95.6%(95%置信区间:89.0-98.8%)在 2 周时成功转换为 LEM。在滴定和维持阶段结束时(第 2 和 14 周),继续服用 LEM 的患者比例分别为 97.8%和 82.2%。总的 TEAEs 发生率为 47.8%;无严重 TEAEs 发生。在所有队列中,在三个患者总体印象-失眠量表的三个评分上,阳性反应的患者比例均高于阴性反应的患者比例。在维持阶段,LEM 转换后第 2、6 和 14 周,失眠严重程度指数评分通常会改善。

结论

对于对当前治疗不满意的失眠症患者,直接转换为 LEM 可能是一种有效的治疗选择。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符,NCT04742699。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe1/10960898/98d3f4260ba1/12325_2024_2811_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验