Lebu Sarah, Lee Allison, Salzberg Aaron, Bauza Valerie
The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 May 15;925:171520. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171520. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
The water sector is facing unprecedented pressures as increased environmental and anthropogenic challenges, such as climate change and rapid urbanization, impact the availability and predictability of safe drinking water. There is a need for practitioners and policymakers to integrate water security and resilience (WS&R) factors into programming to sustain investments in drinking water systems to support associated economic, security, and public health benefits. In response to intensifying impacts from WS&R risks, communities around the world are developing adaptive strategies, and a critical review of these strategies may provide lessons that can be implemented at scale. In this critical review, we systematically screened over 9000 peer-reviewed and grey literature articles and extracted data from relevant studies that propose, pilot, and/or evaluate adaptations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and evaluated the suitability of each adaptation for different contexts. We created a portfolio of adaptive strategies from over 75 LMICs to inform practitioners and policymakers in enhancing the resilience of drinking water systems. Over 20 adaptations were identified, including strategies such as stormwater management, wastewater reuse, non-revenue water reductions, water pricing, and public awareness campaigns. We categorized adaptations by function (improving water management, augmenting existing supplies, reducing water demand) and scale (household, municipal, regional) to provide recommendations tailored to local needs. For each adaptation, we highlighted associated strengths, weaknesses, barriers to adoption, and enabling environments for successful implementation. We propose a novel decision-support tool, called STEP WS&R, that provides a consistent and replicable process for informing high-level investment and policy choices around WS&R. This critical review presents recommendations for practitioners and policymakers to invest in WS&R adaptations, catered to shared risks and contexts.
随着环境和人为挑战的增加,如气候变化和快速城市化,影响了安全饮用水的供应和可预测性,水行业正面临前所未有的压力。从业者和政策制定者需要将水安全和恢复力(WS&R)因素纳入规划,以维持对饮用水系统的投资,从而支持相关的经济、安全和公共卫生效益。为应对WS&R风险带来的日益加剧的影响,世界各地的社区正在制定适应性策略,对这些策略进行批判性审查可能会提供可大规模实施的经验教训。在本次批判性审查中,我们系统筛选了9000多篇同行评审和灰色文献文章,并从相关研究中提取数据,这些研究提出、试点和/或评估了低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的适应性措施,并评估了每种适应性措施在不同背景下的适用性。我们从75个以上的低收入和中等收入国家创建了一个适应性策略组合,以为从业者和政策制定者增强饮用水系统的恢复力提供参考。确定了20多种适应性措施,包括雨水管理、废水回用、减少非收益水、水定价和公众宣传活动等策略。我们按功能(改善水资源管理、增加现有供水、减少用水需求)和规模(家庭、市政、区域)对适应性措施进行分类,以提供针对当地需求的建议。对于每种适应性措施,我们突出了相关的优势、劣势、采用障碍以及成功实施的有利环境。我们提出了一种名为STEP WS&R的新型决策支持工具,该工具为围绕WS&R的高层投资和政策选择提供了一个一致且可复制的流程。本次批判性审查为从业者和政策制定者投资于WS&R适应性措施提出了建议,以应对共同的风险和背景。