Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
L. Moraes Consultoria, Piracicaba, SP 13400-290, Brazil.
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Aug;107(8):5722-5737. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24287. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
Variation in feed components contributes to variation and uncertainty of diets delivered to dairy cows. Forages often have a high inclusion rate (50% to 70% of DM fed) and variable composition, and thus are an important contributor to nutrient variability of delivered diets. Our objective was to quantify the variation and identify the main sources of variability in corn silage and alfalfa-grass haylage composition at harvest (fresh forage) and feed-out (fermented forage) on New York dairy farms. Corn silage and alfalfa-grass haylage were sampled on 8 New York commercial dairy farms during harvest in the summer and fall of 2020 and during their subsequent feed-out in the winter and spring of 2021. At harvest, a composite sample of fresh chopped forage of every 8-ha section of individual fields was collected from piles delivered for silo filling. During a 16-wk feed-out period, 2 independent samples of each forage were collected 3 times per week. The fields of origin of each forage sample during feed-out were identified and recorded using silo maps created at filling. A mixed-model analysis quantified the variance of corn silage DM, NDF, and starch and haylage DM, NDF, and CP content. Fixed effects included soil type, weather conditions, and management practices during harvest and feed-out, and random effects were farm, silo unit, field, and day. At harvest, between-farm variability was the largest source of variation for both corn silage and haylage, but within-farm sources of variation exceeded farm-to-farm variation for haylage at feed-out. At feed-out, haylage DM and NDF content had higher within-farm variability than corn silage. In contrast, corn silage starch showed higher within-farm variation at feed-out than haylage CP content. For DM content at feed-out, day-to-day variation was the most relevant source of within-farm variation for both forages. However, for the nutrient components at feed-out (NDF and CP for haylage; NDF and starch for corn silage) silo-to-silo variation was the largest source of variability. Weather conditions systematically explained a proportion of the farm-to-farm variability for both forages at harvest and feed-out. We concluded that because of the high farm-to-farm variation, corn silage and haylage must be sampled on individual farms. We also concluded that due to the high silo-to-silo variability, and the still significant day-to-day and field-to-field variability within-farm, corn silage and haylage should be sampled within individual silos to better capture changes in forage components at feed-out.
饲料成分的变化导致了奶牛饲料的变化和不确定性。饲料通常具有较高的包含率(50%至 70%的 DM 喂养)和可变成分,因此是交付饲料中营养变异性的重要贡献者。我们的目的是量化变化,并确定在纽约奶牛场收获(新鲜饲料)和喂养(发酵饲料)时玉米青贮和苜蓿-草干草青贮组成的变化和主要来源。2020 年夏季和秋季以及 2021 年冬季和春季的后续喂养期间,在 8 个纽约商业奶牛场对玉米青贮和苜蓿-草干草青贮进行了采样。收获时,从每个青贮饲料的每 8 公顷区域的切碎新鲜草料堆中收集一个混合样本。在 16 周的喂养期间,每周收集 3 次每个饲料的 2 个独立样本。在喂养期间,使用在填充时创建的青贮饲料筒仓地图来确定和记录每个饲料样本的来源地。混合模型分析量化了玉米青贮饲料 DM、NDF 和淀粉以及干草青贮饲料 DM、NDF 和 CP 含量的方差。固定效应包括收获和喂养期间的土壤类型、天气条件和管理实践,随机效应是农场、青贮筒仓单元、田地和日期。收获时,不同农场之间的变异性是玉米青贮和干草青贮的最大变化来源,但在喂养时,干草青贮的农场内来源的变化超过了农场之间的变化。在喂养期间,干草青贮的 DM 和 NDF 含量比玉米青贮的农场内变异性更高。相比之下,在喂养期间,玉米青贮的淀粉比干草青贮的 CP 含量表现出更高的农场内变异性。对于喂养期间的 DM 含量,每天的变化是两种饲料的农场内变异性最相关的来源。然而,对于喂养期间的养分成分(干草青贮的 NDF 和 CP;玉米青贮的 NDF 和淀粉),筒仓之间的变化是最大的变异性来源。天气条件系统地解释了收获和喂养期间两种饲料的农场间变异性的一部分。我们得出的结论是,由于农场之间的高度变异性,必须在各个农场对玉米青贮和干草青贮进行采样。我们还得出结论,由于筒仓之间的高度变异性,以及农场内仍然显著的每天和田间变异性,玉米青贮和干草青贮应在单个筒仓内进行采样,以更好地捕捉喂养期间饲料成分的变化。