Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S917-S931. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.305. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
Assisted vaginal birth rates are falling globally with rising cesarean delivery rates. Cesarean delivery is not without consequence, particularly when carried out in the second stage of labor. Cesarean delivery in the second stage is not entirely protective against pelvic floor morbidity and can lead to serious complications in a subsequent pregnancy. It should be acknowledged that the likelihood of morbidity for mother and baby associated with cesarean delivery increases with advancing labor and is greater than spontaneous vaginal birth, irrespective of the method of operative birth in the second stage of labor. In this article, we argue that assisted vaginal birth is a skilled and safe option that should always be considered and be available as an option for women who need assistance in the second stage of labor. Selecting the most appropriate mode of birth at full dilatation requires accurate clinical assessment, supported decision-making, and personalized care with consideration for the woman's preferences. Achieving vaginal birth with the primary instrument is more likely with forceps than with vacuum extraction (risk ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.88). Midcavity forceps are associated with a greater incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.55) but no difference in neonatal Apgar score or umbilical artery pH. The risk for adverse outcomes is minimized when the procedure is conducted by a skilled accoucheur who selects the most appropriate instrument likely to achieve vaginal birth with the primary instrument. Anticipation of potential complications and dynamic decision-making are just as important as the technique for safe instrument use. Good communication with the woman and the birthing partner is vital and there are various recommendations on how to achieve this. There have been recent developments (such as OdonAssist) in device innovation, training, and strategies for implementation at a scale that can provide opportunities for both improved outcomes and reinvigoration of an essential skill that can save mothers' and babies' lives across the world.
全球辅助阴道分娩率下降,剖宫产率上升。剖宫产并非没有后果,尤其是在第二产程进行时。第二产程行剖宫产并不能完全预防盆底发病率,并且可能导致后续妊娠的严重并发症。应该承认,与剖宫产相关的母婴发病率增加与产程进展有关,并且大于自然阴道分娩,无论第二产程的手术分娩方式如何。在本文中,我们认为,辅助阴道分娩是一种熟练且安全的选择,应始终被视为需要在第二产程中提供帮助的女性的一种选择。在完全扩张时选择最合适的分娩方式需要准确的临床评估、支持性决策以及考虑到女性偏好的个性化护理。与真空吸引器相比,产钳更有可能实现主要器械的阴道分娩(风险比,0.58;95%置信区间,0.39-0.88)。中骨盆产钳与产科肛门括约肌损伤的发生率更高(比值比,1.83;95%置信区间,1.32-2.55),但新生儿 Apgar 评分或脐动脉 pH 无差异。当熟练的产科医生进行操作并选择最有可能实现主要器械阴道分娩的最合适器械时,可将手术风险降至最低。对潜在并发症的预测和动态决策与安全器械使用的技术同样重要。与妇女和分娩伴侣进行良好沟通至关重要,并且有各种关于如何实现这一目标的建议。在设备创新、培训和实施策略方面,最近取得了一些进展(如 OdonAssist),这为改善结果和振兴可以挽救全球母婴生命的基本技能提供了机会。