Sena Jessica, Bandyopadhyay Sabyasachi, Mostafiz Mohammad Tahsin, Davidson Andrea, Guan Ziyuan, Barreto Jesimon, Ozrazgat-Baslanti Tezcan, Tighe Patrick, Bihorac Azra, Schwartz William Robson, Rashidi Parisa
Federal University of Minas Gerais/Department of Computer Science, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
University of Florida/J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gainesville, USA.
IEEE Int Conf Bioinform Biomed Workshops. 2023 Dec;2023:2207-2212. doi: 10.1109/bibm58861.2023.10385764. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
Quantifying pain in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) is challenging due to the increased prevalence of communication barriers in this patient population. Previous research has posited a positive correlation between pain and physical activity in critically ill patients. In this study, we advance this hypothesis by building machine learning classifiers to examine the ability of accelerometer data collected from daily wearables to predict self-reported pain levels experienced by patients in the ICU. We trained multiple Machine Learning (ML) models, including Logistic Regression, CatBoost, and XG-Boost, on statistical features extracted from the accelerometer data combined with previous pain measurements and patient demographics. Following previous studies that showed a change in pain sensitivity in ICU patients at night, we performed the task of pain classification separately for daytime and nighttime pain reports. In the pain versus no-pain classification setting, logistic regression gave the best classifier in daytime (AUC: 0.72, F1-score: 0.72), and CatBoost gave the best classifier at nighttime (AUC: 0.82, F1-score: 0.82). Performance of logistic regression dropped to 0.61 AUC, 0.62 F1-score (mild vs. moderate pain, nighttime), and CatBoost's performance was similarly affected with 0.61 AUC, 0.60 F1-score (moderate vs. severe pain, daytime). The inclusion of analgesic information benefited the classification between moderate and severe pain. SHAP analysis was conducted to find the most significant features in each setting. It assigned the highest importance to accelerometer-related features on all evaluated settings but also showed the contribution of the other features such as age and medications in specific contexts. In conclusion, accelerometer data combined with patient demographics and previous pain measurements can be used to screen painful from painless episodes in the ICU and can be combined with analgesic information to provide moderate classification between painful episodes of different severities.
由于重症监护病房(ICU)患者中沟通障碍的患病率增加,对入住该病房的患者进行疼痛量化具有挑战性。先前的研究认为重症患者的疼痛与身体活动之间存在正相关。在本研究中,我们通过构建机器学习分类器来推进这一假设,以检验从日常可穿戴设备收集的加速度计数据预测ICU患者自我报告疼痛水平的能力。我们在从加速度计数据中提取的统计特征与先前的疼痛测量数据及患者人口统计学信息相结合的基础上,训练了多个机器学习(ML)模型,包括逻辑回归、CatBoost和XG - Boost。继先前显示ICU患者夜间疼痛敏感性变化的研究之后,我们分别针对白天和夜间的疼痛报告执行疼痛分类任务。在疼痛与无疼痛分类设置中,逻辑回归在白天给出了最佳分类器(AUC:0.72,F1分数:0.72),而CatBoost在夜间给出了最佳分类器(AUC:0.82,F1分数:0.82)。逻辑回归的性能在夜间降至AUC 0.61,F1分数0.62(轻度与中度疼痛),CatBoost的性能也受到类似影响,在白天为AUC 0.61,F1分数0.60(中度与重度疼痛)。纳入镇痛信息有利于中度和重度疼痛之间的分类。进行SHAP分析以找出每种设置中最显著的特征。它在所有评估设置中赋予与加速度计相关的特征最高重要性,但也显示了其他特征(如年龄和药物)在特定情况下的贡献。总之,加速度计数据与患者人口统计学信息及先前的疼痛测量数据相结合,可用于在ICU中筛选无痛和疼痛发作,并且可与镇痛信息相结合,以对不同严重程度的疼痛发作进行中度分类。