Arbour Caroline, Choinière Manon, Topolovec-Vranic Jane, Loiselle Carmen G, Gélinas Céline
McGill University, Ingram School of Nursing, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2A7 ; Centre for Nursing Research and Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2 ; Quebec Nursing Intervention Research Network (RRISIQ), Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2A7 ; The Alan Edwards Center for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 0G1.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2X 0A9.
Pain Res Treat. 2014;2014:175794. doi: 10.1155/2014/175794. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
Background. Many critically ill patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) are unable to communicate. While observation of behaviors is recommended for pain assessment in nonverbal populations, they are undetectable in TBI patients who are under the effects of neuroblocking agents. Aim. This study aimed to validate the use of vital signs for pain detection in critically ill TBI patients. Methods. Using a repeated measure within subject design, participants (N = 45) were observed for 1 minute before (baseline), during, and 15 minutes after two procedures: noninvasive blood pressure: NIBP (nonnociceptive) and turning (nociceptive). At each assessment, vital signs (e.g., systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), capillary saturation (SpO2), end-tidal CO2, and intracranial pressure (ICP)) were recorded. Results. Significant fluctuations (P < 0.05) in diastolic (F = 6.087), HR (F = 3.566), SpO2 (F = 5.740), and ICP (F = 3.776) were found across assessments, but they were similar during both procedures. In contrast, RR was found to increase exclusively during turning (t = 3.933; P < 0.001) and was correlated to participants' self-report. Conclusions. Findings from this study support previous ones that vital signs are not specific for pain detection. While RR could be a potential pain indicator in critical care, further research is warranted to support its validity in TBI patients with different LOC.
背景。许多患有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的重症患者无法进行沟通。虽然对于非言语人群的疼痛评估建议观察行为,但在接受神经阻滞剂作用的TBI患者中这些行为无法被检测到。目的。本研究旨在验证生命体征在重症TBI患者疼痛检测中的应用。方法。采用受试者内重复测量设计,在两种操作前(基线)、操作期间和操作后15分钟对参与者(N = 45)进行1分钟的观察:无创血压:NIBP(非伤害性)和翻身(伤害性)。在每次评估时,记录生命体征(例如收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、毛细血管饱和度(SpO2)、呼气末二氧化碳分压和颅内压(ICP))。结果。在各次评估中发现舒张压(F = 6.087)、HR(F = 3.566)、SpO2(F = 5.740)和ICP(F = 3.776)有显著波动(P < 0.05),但在两种操作期间相似。相比之下,发现RR仅在翻身期间增加(t = 3.933;P < 0.001),并且与参与者的自我报告相关。结论。本研究结果支持先前的研究结果,即生命体征并非疼痛检测的特异性指标。虽然RR可能是重症监护中的潜在疼痛指标,但需要进一步研究以支持其在不同意识水平的TBI患者中的有效性。