Suppr超能文献

生命体征波动能否用于创伤性脑损伤重症患者的疼痛评估?

Can fluctuations in vital signs be used for pain assessment in critically ill patients with a traumatic brain injury?

作者信息

Arbour Caroline, Choinière Manon, Topolovec-Vranic Jane, Loiselle Carmen G, Gélinas Céline

机构信息

McGill University, Ingram School of Nursing, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2A7 ; Centre for Nursing Research and Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2 ; Quebec Nursing Intervention Research Network (RRISIQ), Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2A7 ; The Alan Edwards Center for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 0G1.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2X 0A9.

出版信息

Pain Res Treat. 2014;2014:175794. doi: 10.1155/2014/175794. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

Abstract

Background. Many critically ill patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) are unable to communicate. While observation of behaviors is recommended for pain assessment in nonverbal populations, they are undetectable in TBI patients who are under the effects of neuroblocking agents. Aim. This study aimed to validate the use of vital signs for pain detection in critically ill TBI patients. Methods. Using a repeated measure within subject design, participants (N = 45) were observed for 1 minute before (baseline), during, and 15 minutes after two procedures: noninvasive blood pressure: NIBP (nonnociceptive) and turning (nociceptive). At each assessment, vital signs (e.g., systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), capillary saturation (SpO2), end-tidal CO2, and intracranial pressure (ICP)) were recorded. Results. Significant fluctuations (P < 0.05) in diastolic (F = 6.087), HR (F = 3.566), SpO2 (F = 5.740), and ICP (F = 3.776) were found across assessments, but they were similar during both procedures. In contrast, RR was found to increase exclusively during turning (t = 3.933; P < 0.001) and was correlated to participants' self-report. Conclusions. Findings from this study support previous ones that vital signs are not specific for pain detection. While RR could be a potential pain indicator in critical care, further research is warranted to support its validity in TBI patients with different LOC.

摘要

背景。许多患有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的重症患者无法进行沟通。虽然对于非言语人群的疼痛评估建议观察行为,但在接受神经阻滞剂作用的TBI患者中这些行为无法被检测到。目的。本研究旨在验证生命体征在重症TBI患者疼痛检测中的应用。方法。采用受试者内重复测量设计,在两种操作前(基线)、操作期间和操作后15分钟对参与者(N = 45)进行1分钟的观察:无创血压:NIBP(非伤害性)和翻身(伤害性)。在每次评估时,记录生命体征(例如收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、毛细血管饱和度(SpO2)、呼气末二氧化碳分压和颅内压(ICP))。结果。在各次评估中发现舒张压(F = 6.087)、HR(F = 3.566)、SpO2(F = 5.740)和ICP(F = 3.776)有显著波动(P < 0.05),但在两种操作期间相似。相比之下,发现RR仅在翻身期间增加(t = 3.933;P < 0.001),并且与参与者的自我报告相关。结论。本研究结果支持先前的研究结果,即生命体征并非疼痛检测的特异性指标。虽然RR可能是重症监护中的潜在疼痛指标,但需要进一步研究以支持其在不同意识水平的TBI患者中的有效性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Potentials and Challenges of Pervasive Sensing in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中普适传感的潜力与挑战
Front Digit Health. 2022 May 17;4:773387. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.773387. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Monitoring devices in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中的监测设备。
Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Dec;92(6):1387-402. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
3
Multiple comparison analysis testing in ANOVA.方差分析中的多重比较分析检验。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2011;21(3):203-9. doi: 10.11613/bm.2011.029.
10
Pain and traumatic brain injury.疼痛与创伤性脑损伤
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2007 Feb;18(1):145-63, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2006.11.008.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验