• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和临床医生对支持性用餐时间作为神经性厌食症治疗一部分的看法:系统评价和定性综合。

Patient and clinician perspectives on supported mealtimes as part of anorexia nervosa treatment: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.

机构信息

Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, Enfield, UK.

Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2024 Jul;32(4):731-747. doi: 10.1002/erv.3081. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1002/erv.3081
PMID:38466637
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature on clinicians' and patients' experiences of supported mealtimes in the treatment of anorexia nervosa.

METHOD

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022372565). PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Embase were searched up to the 20 of November 2023 for qualitative articles investigating the perspectives of healthcare professionals and patients on clinician-supported meals across all clinical settings. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used to evaluate the quality of selected studies.

RESULTS

This review comprised of 26 studies; eight concerned with the perspectives of clinicians only, 16 addressing patients' views, and two studies exploring the views of both groups. Experiences of both groups were generally negative, and three overlapping themes were identified: lack of consistency in care provided, high levels of negative emotions and an uncomfortable power dynamic.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that supported mealtimes are experienced more positively by patients when rules are clear and consistently enforced, and when clinicians make informal conversation and supportive comments. Our findings highlight the need for best practice guidelines and clinician training to improve the delivery of supported mealtimes. Such guidelines and training should be coproduced in collaboration with patients and carers.

摘要

目的

系统综述临床医生和患者在治疗神经性厌食症中支持用餐的体验。

方法

本系统评价按照 PRISMA 指南进行,并在 PROSPERO(CRD42022372565)上进行了注册。截至 2023 年 11 月 20 日,通过 PsycINFO、MEDLINE 和 Embase 检索了所有临床环境中调查医疗保健专业人员和患者对临床医生支持的膳食的观点的定性文章。使用主题合成法对数据进行分析。使用批判性评估技能计划来评估选定研究的质量。

结果

本综述包括 26 项研究;8 项研究关注临床医生的观点,16 项研究探讨了患者的观点,2 项研究探讨了两组的观点。两组的经验普遍负面,确定了三个重叠的主题:提供的护理缺乏一致性、负面情绪水平高以及令人不舒服的权力动态。

结论

本综述表明,当规则明确并始终得到执行,并且临床医生进行非正式对话和提供支持性评论时,患者对支持用餐的体验更为积极。我们的研究结果强调了制定最佳实践指南和临床医生培训的必要性,以改善支持用餐的实施。此类指南和培训应与患者和护理人员合作共同制定。

相似文献

1
Patient and clinician perspectives on supported mealtimes as part of anorexia nervosa treatment: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.患者和临床医生对支持性用餐时间作为神经性厌食症治疗一部分的看法:系统评价和定性综合。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2024 Jul;32(4):731-747. doi: 10.1002/erv.3081. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Child, family and professional views on valued communication outcomes for non-verbal children with neurodisability: A qualitative meta-synthesis.儿童、家庭和专业人员对神经发育障碍的非言语儿童有价值的沟通结果的看法:定性元分析。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2946-2984. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13121. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
5
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
6
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
7
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
8
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.

引用本文的文献

1
A living experience proposal for the co-occurring diagnosis of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and other eating disorders.关于回避/限制性食物摄入障碍与其他饮食失调共病诊断的生活体验建议。
J Eat Disord. 2024 Aug 5;12(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01073-1.