Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, 14040-904, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024 Apr 29;53(4):233-239. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twae008.
This study evaluated the effect of metal artefact reduction (MAR) level and tube current on the assessment of dental implant positioning relative to the mandibular canal (MC) through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Titanium dental implants were placed in dried mandibles at 0.5-mm superior to the MC (group 1/n = 8) and 0.5-mm inside the MC with perforation of the cortex (group 2/n = 10). CBCT scans were obtained with different levels of MAR (off, medium, and high) and 2 tube currents (4 and 8 mA). Four examiners analysed the images and scored the contact between the implant and the MC using a 5-point scale. Sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and frequency of scores were calculated. Data were compared with analysis of variance 2-way and Tukey's test and scores with Chi-square test.
Specificity and area under ROC curve decreased significantly when MAR level was high compared with MAR-medium and MAR-off. The frequency of score 3 (inconclusive) was the highest, and scores 1 and 5 (definitely no contact and definitely contact, respectively) were the lowest with MAR-high, regardless of the tube current. When MAR was off, there were higher frequencies of scores 1 and 5.
The level of MAR influences the assessment of the relationship between the dental implant and the MC. MAR-high led to lower diagnostic accuracy compared with MAR-medium and off.
This article shows that high level of MAR can interfere in the diagnostic of dental implant positioning relative to the MC, decreasing its accuracy.
本研究通过锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估金属伪影降低(MAR)水平和管电流对评估种植体相对于下颌管(MC)位置的影响。
将钛牙种植体放置在 MC 上方 0.5mm(第 1 组,n=8)和 MC 内 0.5mm 处(第 2 组,n=10),种植体穿透皮质。使用不同 MAR 水平(关闭、中、高)和 2 个管电流(4 和 8mA)获取 CBCT 扫描。4 名检查者使用 5 分制评估图像,并评估种植体与 MC 之间的接触情况。计算灵敏度、特异性、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积和评分频率。采用方差分析 2 路和 Tukey 检验进行数据比较,采用卡方检验进行评分比较。
与 MAR 中相比,MAR 高时特异性和 ROC 曲线下面积显著降低。MAR 高时,评分 3(不确定)的频率最高,评分 1 和 5(无接触和肯定接触)的频率最低,无论管电流如何。当 MAR 关闭时,评分 1 和 5 的频率更高。
MAR 水平会影响评估种植体与 MC 之间的关系。与 MAR 中相比,MAR 高会降低诊断准确性。
本文表明,高 MAR 水平会干扰种植体相对于 MC 位置的诊断,降低其准确性。