• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估林牧结合管理作为减少燃料负荷和降低野火风险的一种策略。

Assessing silvopasture management as a strategy to reduce fuel loads and mitigate wildfire risk.

作者信息

Batcheler Mark, Smith Matthew M, Swanson Mark E, Ostrom Marcia, Carpenter-Boggs Lynne

机构信息

Corvallis Forestry Sciences Laboratory, USDA National Agroforestry Center, 3200 Southwest Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.

USDA National Agroforestry Center, 1945 North 38Th Street, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 12;14(1):5954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56104-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-56104-3
PMID:38467773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10928111/
Abstract

Managing private forests for wildfire resilience is challenging due to conflicting social, economic, and ecological decisions that may result in an increase of surface fuel loads leading to greater fire risk. Due to fire suppression and a changing climate, land managers in fire-prone regions face an increasing threat of high severity fires. Thus, land managers need fuel treatment options that match their forest types and management objectives. One potential option for producers that graze livestock is silvopasture management, where livestock, forages, and overstory vegetation are carefully managed for co-benefits on the same unit of land. This study compared forest composition and structure, fuel types, and vegetative biomass between silvopasture and non-grazed managed forests in Washington, U.S. We show that silvopasture management results in reductions in grass biomass, litter, and duff depth when compared to non-grazed managed forest. These findings point to the integrated nature of silvopasture, where management of overstory composition and structure, understory vegetation, and grazing can reduce fuel loads and potential wildfire risk.

摘要

由于社会、经济和生态决策相互冲突,管理私有森林以增强其野火抵御能力具有挑战性,这些冲突可能导致地表燃料负荷增加,进而带来更大的火灾风险。由于火灾抑制和气候变化,火灾易发地区的土地管理者面临着高强度火灾的威胁日益增加。因此,土地管理者需要与他们的森林类型和管理目标相匹配的燃料处理方案。对于放牧牲畜的生产者来说,一个潜在的选择是林牧结合管理,即在同一土地单元上对牲畜、草料和上层植被进行精心管理,以实现共同效益。本研究比较了美国华盛顿州林牧结合管理的森林和非放牧管理的森林之间的森林组成和结构、燃料类型以及植被生物量。我们发现,与非放牧管理的森林相比,林牧结合管理会使草本生物量、枯枝落叶和腐殖质层深度减少。这些发现表明了林牧结合的综合性,即对上层组成和结构、下层植被以及放牧的管理可以减少燃料负荷和潜在的野火风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccfc/10928111/adcd6fba7bd2/41598_2024_56104_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccfc/10928111/d42259a52b0f/41598_2024_56104_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccfc/10928111/adcd6fba7bd2/41598_2024_56104_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccfc/10928111/d42259a52b0f/41598_2024_56104_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccfc/10928111/adcd6fba7bd2/41598_2024_56104_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing silvopasture management as a strategy to reduce fuel loads and mitigate wildfire risk.评估林牧结合管理作为减少燃料负荷和降低野火风险的一种策略。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 12;14(1):5954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56104-3.
2
Can wildland fire management alter 21st-century subalpine fire and forests in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, USA?能否通过管理野外火灾来改变 21 世纪美国怀俄明州大提顿国家公园的亚高山火和森林?
Ecol Appl. 2020 Mar;30(2):e02030. doi: 10.1002/eap.2030. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
Vegetation dynamics following compound disturbance in a dry pine forest: fuel treatment then bark beetle outbreak.复合干扰后干旱松林的植被动态:先进行燃料处理,然后发生树皮甲虫爆发。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Mar;30(2):e02023. doi: 10.1002/eap.2023. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions.适应北美西部森林应对气候变化和野火:10 个常见问题。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Dec;31(8):e02433. doi: 10.1002/eap.2433. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
Multitemporal lidar captures heterogeneity in fuel loads and consumption on the Kaibab Plateau.多时相激光雷达捕捉到了凯巴布高原燃料负荷和消耗的异质性。
Fire Ecol. 2022;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s42408-022-00142-7. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
6
Forest restoration and fuels reduction work: Different pathways for achieving success in the Sierra Nevada.森林恢复和燃料削减工作:内华达山脉取得成功的不同途径。
Ecol Appl. 2024 Mar;34(2):e2932. doi: 10.1002/eap.2932. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
7
Vegetation structure parameters determine high burn severity likelihood in different ecosystem types: A case study in a burned Mediterranean landscape.植被结构参数决定不同生态系统类型中高燃烧严重程度的可能性:以地中海景观火烧迹地为例。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 15;288:112462. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112462. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
8
Mechanical treatments and prescribed burning can reintroduce low-severity fire in southern Australian temperate sclerophyll forests.机械处理和规定火烧可以在澳大利亚南部温带硬叶林中重新引入低强度火灾。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118301. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118301. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
9
Fuel treatment effectiveness in the context of landform, vegetation, and large, wind-driven wildfires.在地形、植被和大型、风力驱动的野火背景下的燃料处理效果。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jul;30(5):e02104. doi: 10.1002/eap.2104. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
10
Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest ecosystems.减少森林燃料会改变太平洋西北地区三个生态系统的火灾严重程度和长期碳储存。
Ecol Appl. 2009 Apr;19(3):643-55. doi: 10.1890/08-0501.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of Forest Tree Species Composition: Selected Results of the National Forest Inventory of Lithuania.立陶宛国家森林资源清查中林木树种组成的发展:部分结果
Plants (Basel). 2025 Feb 21;14(5):667. doi: 10.3390/plants14050667.

本文引用的文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 indoor air transmission is a threat that can be addressed with science.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的室内空气传播是一个可以通过科学手段应对的威胁。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 9;118(45). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116155118.
2
Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions.适应北美西部森林应对气候变化和野火:10 个常见问题。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Dec;31(8):e02433. doi: 10.1002/eap.2433. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
3
Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests.
人为气候变化对美国西部森林野火的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 18;113(42):11770-11775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607171113. Epub 2016 Oct 10.