Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Cardiologie, l'institut du Thorax, 44000, Nantes, France.
INSERM Unit 1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton, Nantes, France.
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2024 Aug;15(4):443-450. doi: 10.1007/s13239-024-00726-1. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
Pre-stenting of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is commonly performed before percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI), to relieve obstruction, prevent valved stent fractures, and provide a landing zone. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of the stents currently used to perform pre-stenting of the RVOT.
We assessed five commercially available stents: Cheatham-Platinum Stent ("CP Stent"), AndraStent XL, AndraStent XXL, Optimus XL, and Optimus XXL. Following stent deployment at nominal pressure, radial and longitudinal elastic recoils and radial resistance were measured. The bending stiffness of the stents crimped onto the balloons was also evaluated.
Three samples were tested for each stent. Our study showed no significant difference between the stent platforms in terms of radial elastic recoil, which was relatively low (< 10%). The longitudinal elastic recoil was also low for all the devices (< 5%). Significant differences were observed in radial resistance (P < 0.001). CP Stent and AndraStent XL exhibited the highest radial resistances. The bending stiffnesses of the stents crimped on their balloons were significantly different (P < 0.00001). Optimus XL and XXL were more flexible than the other stents.
This study highlights the significant differences between the stents currently used in RVOT pre-stenting. Stents with good radial resistance are preferred, especially for calcified vessels, and flexibility is crucial for tortuous vessels. We proposed an algorithm for selecting the most suitable stent according to the need for radial force and flexibility, which will help inform clinicians considering RVOT revalvulation.
经皮肺动脉瓣植入术(PPVI)前常对右心室流出道(RVOT)进行预支架置入,以缓解梗阻、防止瓣膜支架断裂并提供一个着陆区。本研究旨在评估目前用于 RVOT 预支架置入的支架的生物力学特性。
我们评估了五种市售支架:Cheatham-Platinum 支架(“CP 支架”)、AndraStent XL、AndraStent XXL、Optimus XL 和 Optimus XXL。在标称压力下支架扩张后,测量径向和纵向弹性回缩以及径向阻力。还评估了支架在球囊上卷曲的弯曲刚度。
每种支架均测试了三个样本。我们的研究表明,支架平台的径向弹性回缩没有显著差异,相对较低(<10%)。所有装置的纵向弹性回缩也较低(<5%)。径向阻力有显著差异(P<0.001)。CP 支架和 AndraStent XL 表现出最高的径向阻力。卷曲在球囊上的支架的弯曲刚度有显著差异(P<0.00001)。Optimus XL 和 XXL 比其他支架更灵活。
本研究强调了目前用于 RVOT 预支架置入的支架之间的显著差异。具有良好径向阻力的支架是首选,特别是对于钙化血管,而灵活性对于迂曲血管至关重要。我们提出了一种根据需要的径向力和灵活性选择最合适支架的算法,这将有助于为考虑 RVOT 再狭窄的临床医生提供信息。