• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Biosecurity measures for the prevention of African swine fever on German pig farms: comparison of farmers' own appraisals and external veterinary experts' evaluations.德国猪场预防非洲猪瘟的生物安全措施:农民自身评估与外部兽医专家评估的比较
Porcine Health Manag. 2024 Mar 11;10(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40813-024-00365-x.
2
Exploring pig farmers' decision-making concerning biosecurity measures against African Swine Fever.探讨养猪户针对非洲猪瘟采取生物安全措施的决策。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Aug;217:105949. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105949. Epub 2023 May 30.
3
Enhancing infection control practices and biosecurity plans on Swedish pig farms: insights, challenges, and strategies.加强瑞典养猪场的感染控制措施和生物安全计划:见解、挑战和策略。
Acta Vet Scand. 2024 Sep 11;66(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13028-024-00771-9.
4
The first outbreak of African swine fever in Sweden: a survey of pig farmers' perceptions of information received, risks, biosecurity measures and future prospects.瑞典首次爆发非洲猪瘟:对养猪户对所收到信息、风险、生物安全措施和未来前景的看法的调查。
Acta Vet Scand. 2023 Dec 18;65(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13028-023-00722-w.
5
African swine fever and outdoor farming of pigs.非洲猪瘟与猪的户外养殖
EFSA J. 2021 Jun 9;19(6):e06639. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6639. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
A survey of biosecurity practices of pig farmers in selected districts affected by African swine fever in Uganda.乌干达部分受非洲猪瘟影响地区养猪户生物安全措施调查。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Aug 17;10:1245754. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1245754. eCollection 2023.
7
A multi-state survey of farm-level preparedness towards African swine fever outbreak in Nigeria.尼日利亚农场层面针对非洲猪瘟疫情暴发的多州调查。
Acta Trop. 2023 Oct;246:106989. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2023.106989. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
8
Smallholders' perceptions on biosecurity and disease control in relation to African swine fever in an endemically infected area in Northern Uganda.乌干达北部一个地方性感染地区小农户对非洲猪瘟的生物安全和疾病控制的看法。
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Aug 5;15(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2005-7.
9
An analysis of the social, cultural, and ecological factors that affect the implementation of biosecurity measures on smallholder commercial swine farms in Italy in the context of an emerging African Swine Fever outbreak.分析在非洲猪瘟疫情暴发的背景下,影响意大利小农商业养猪场实施生物安全措施的社会、文化和生态因素。
Prev Vet Med. 2024 Aug;229:106238. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106238. Epub 2024 May 28.
10
Risk factors for farm-level African swine fever infection in major pig-producing areas in Nigeria, 1997-2011.1997-2011 年尼日利亚主要养猪地区农场层面非洲猪瘟感染的风险因素。
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Nov 1;107(1-2):65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Biosecurity Versus African Swine Fever-Making, Acceptance, and Results of a German Online Assessment Tool.生物安全与非洲猪瘟——德国在线评估工具的制定、接受度及结果
Pathogens. 2025 May 23;14(6):524. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14060524.
2
Evaluating the Global Distribution and Characteristics of Research Studies Focusing on Swine Farm Biosecurity: A Scoping Review.评估聚焦于猪场生物安全的研究的全球分布及特征:一项范围综述
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Nov 20;2024:6497633. doi: 10.1155/2024/6497633. eCollection 2024.
3
The impact of epidemic experiences on biosecurity behavior of pig farmers: an analysis based on protection motivation theory.疫情经历对养猪户生物安全行为的影响:基于保护动机理论的分析
One Health. 2024 Nov 17;19:100936. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100936. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring pig farmers' decision-making concerning biosecurity measures against African Swine Fever.探讨养猪户针对非洲猪瘟采取生物安全措施的决策。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Aug;217:105949. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105949. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
Veterinary communication can influence farmer Change Talk and can be modified following brief Motivational Interviewing training.兽医沟通可以影响养殖户的“改变对话”,并可以通过简短的动机性访谈培训进行修改。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0265586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265586. eCollection 2022.
3
African Swine Fever, the forgotten pandemic.非洲猪瘟,被遗忘的大流行病。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 Sep;68(5):2637-2639. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14245.
4
Epidemiological analysis of African swine fever in the European Union (September 2019 to August 2020).欧盟非洲猪瘟流行病学分析(2019年9月至2020年8月)
EFSA J. 2021 May 6;19(5):e06572. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6572. eCollection 2021 May.
5
No evidence for African swine fever virus DNA in haematophagous arthropods collected at wild boar baiting sites in Estonia.在爱沙尼亚野猪诱捕点采集的吸血节肢动物中未发现非洲猪瘟病毒 DNA。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 Sep;68(5):2696-2702. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14013. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
Biosecurity in pig farms: a review.猪场生物安全:综述
Porcine Health Manag. 2021 Jan 4;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00181-z.
7
African Swine Fever in Two Large Commercial Pig Farms in LATVIA-Estimation of the High Risk Period and Virus Spread within the Farm.拉脱维亚两个大型商业养猪场的非洲猪瘟——高风险期估计及病毒在农场内的传播
Vet Sci. 2020 Aug 7;7(3):105. doi: 10.3390/vetsci7030105.
8
African swine fever - A review of current knowledge.非洲猪瘟综述:当前知识回顾。
Virus Res. 2020 Oct 2;287:198099. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198099. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
9
Epidemiological analyses of African swine fever in the European Union (November 2017 until November 2018).欧盟非洲猪瘟流行病学分析(2017年11月至2018年11月)
EFSA J. 2018 Nov 29;16(11):e05494. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5494. eCollection 2018 Nov.
10
Epidemiological analyses of African swine fever in the Baltic States and Poland: (Update September 2016-September 2017).波罗的海国家和波兰非洲猪瘟的流行病学分析:(2016年9月 - 2017年9月更新)
EFSA J. 2017 Nov 7;15(11):e05068. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5068. eCollection 2017 Nov.

德国猪场预防非洲猪瘟的生物安全措施:农民自身评估与外部兽医专家评估的比较

Biosecurity measures for the prevention of African swine fever on German pig farms: comparison of farmers' own appraisals and external veterinary experts' evaluations.

作者信息

Klein Leonie, Gerdes Ursula, Blome Sandra, Campe Amely, Grosse Beilage Elisabeth

机构信息

Department of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training for Health in the Human-Animal-Environment Interface, University for Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Buenteweg 2, 30559, Hannover, Germany.

Niedersaechsische Tierseuchenkasse (Animal Disease Fund), Bruehlstrasse 9, 30169, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Porcine Health Manag. 2024 Mar 11;10(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40813-024-00365-x.

DOI:10.1186/s40813-024-00365-x
PMID:38468332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10926670/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since its first introduction into the German wild boar population in 2020, African swine fever (ASF) has been spreading slowly from the eastern border westwards and has been introduced into eight domestic pig farms thus far. The European Food Safety Authority has named deficits in farm biosecurity and increased human activity as major risk factors for the introduction of the ASF virus into pig farms. Studies have shown that pig farms in Germany generally have a high level of biosecurity. However, veterinary practitioners and policy-makers have expressed concerns that not all pig farmers are appropriately prepared to deal with the threat of ASF. This study aimed to evaluate the level of biosecurity on pig farms in Lower Saxony and explore the reasons for deficits in the implementation of biosecurity measures. For this purpose, pig farmers were interviewed in open structured face-to-face interviews about their perception of ASF and biosecurity, and the implemented measures on their farms were assessed with a checklist. In the data analysis, the farmers' answers and the results of the biosecurity check were compared to gain further insights into the factors influencing the implementation of biosecurity measures on the farms.

RESULTS

The biosecurity check showed that on most farms, a high level of biosecurity had been implemented. Nevertheless, deficits were found concerning the fences and the delimitation of clean and dirty areas on farm grounds and in the anteroom. Overall, the farmers were well informed about ASF and had a realistic perception of their own biosecurity. They considered the farm layout, financial means and practicality of hygiene measures to be the main barriers to implementing biosecurity measures against ASF. However, the results also suggested that farmers' attitudes and legal regulations were major influencing factors.

CONCLUSION

The results indicated a high level of biosecurity against ASF on most pig farms and a realistic perception of their own biosecurity by the farmers. Current knowledge transfer and information should focus on building upon the farmers' own motivation and expertise and supporting them to put existing knowledge into practice.

摘要

背景

自2020年首次传入德国野猪种群以来,非洲猪瘟(ASF)一直从东部边境缓慢向西蔓延,迄今已传入8个家养猪场。欧洲食品安全局指出,农场生物安全方面的缺陷以及人类活动增加是ASF病毒传入猪场的主要风险因素。研究表明,德国的猪场普遍具有较高的生物安全水平。然而,兽医从业者和政策制定者担心并非所有养猪户都做好了应对ASF威胁的充分准备。本研究旨在评估下萨克森州猪场的生物安全水平,并探究生物安全措施实施存在缺陷的原因。为此,通过开放式结构化面对面访谈询问养猪户对ASF和生物安全的看法,并使用清单评估其农场实施的措施。在数据分析中,将养殖户的回答与生物安全检查结果进行比较,以进一步深入了解影响农场生物安全措施实施的因素。

结果

生物安全检查表明,大多数农场已实施了较高水平的生物安全措施。然而,在农场场地和前厅的围栏以及清洁区和脏污区的划分方面仍存在缺陷。总体而言,养殖户对ASF有充分了解,对自身生物安全有现实的认知。他们认为农场布局、资金状况和卫生措施的实用性是实施针对ASF的生物安全措施的主要障碍。然而,结果还表明,养殖户的态度和法律法规是主要影响因素。

结论

结果表明,大多数猪场针对ASF的生物安全水平较高,养殖户对自身生物安全有现实的认知。当前的知识转移和信息应侧重于基于养殖户自身的积极性和专业知识,并支持他们将现有知识付诸实践。