Suppr超能文献

评估聚焦于猪场生物安全的研究的全球分布及特征:一项范围综述

Evaluating the Global Distribution and Characteristics of Research Studies Focusing on Swine Farm Biosecurity: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Agrawal Isha, Kerby Erin E, Varga Csaba

机构信息

Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana 61801, Illinois, USA.

University Library, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana 61801, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Nov 20;2024:6497633. doi: 10.1155/2024/6497633. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Despite significant advances in swine biosecurity (BS) over the last decade, BS plans have yet to be broadly adopted on swine farms. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScRs) framework was followed to review the literature, describe the worldwide distribution of publications on swine farm BS, and characterize the research methodologies used. The final data extraction and analysis included 157 publications originating from 48 countries. Several publications (=93) used face-to-face interviews for data collection. An increase in the adoption of online and multimode approaches was detected after 2009. Many publications (=92) focussed on the impact of BS on the incidence of swine diseases such as porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) and African swine fever (ASF). Only 16 studies reported proposing incentives for study participation. Regions with high publication numbers were detected in Western and Southern Europe, Northeast of South America, and East Africa. Areas with low publication numbers were in Eastern Europe, North and Central Africa, Central America, and the Northwest of South America. This study identified the most common study methodologies used to assess swine farm BS. Countries with limited swine BS research studies were identified where future investigations are needed.

摘要

尽管在过去十年中猪生物安全(BS)方面取得了重大进展,但猪场的生物安全计划尚未得到广泛采用。我们遵循系统评价和Meta分析扩展的范围综述(PRISMA-ScRs)框架来回顾文献,描述猪场生物安全相关出版物的全球分布,并对所使用的研究方法进行特征描述。最终的数据提取和分析包括来自48个国家的157篇出版物。有几篇出版物(=93)采用面对面访谈来收集数据。2009年后,发现采用在线和多模式方法的情况有所增加。许多出版物(=92)关注生物安全对猪病发病率的影响,如猪繁殖与呼吸综合征(PRRS)和非洲猪瘟(ASF)。只有16项研究报告提出了参与研究的激励措施。在西欧和南欧、南美洲东北部以及东非发现了高出版物数量的地区。出版物数量低的地区在东欧、北非和中非、中美洲以及南美洲西北部。本研究确定了用于评估猪场生物安全的最常见研究方法。确定了猪生物安全研究有限的国家,并指出了未来需要进行调查的地方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/107b0843e74a/TBED2024-6497633.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Global Distribution and Characteristics of Research Studies Focusing on Swine Farm Biosecurity: A Scoping Review.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Nov 20;2024:6497633. doi: 10.1155/2024/6497633. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessment of biosecurity practices and development of a scoring system in swine farms using item response theory.
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Jun 1;167:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
3
Expert Opinion on the Perceived Effectiveness and Importance of On-Farm Biosecurity Measures for Cattle and Swine Farms in Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 10;10(12):e0144533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144533. eCollection 2015.
4
African swine fever outbreak on a medium-sized farm in Uganda: biosecurity breaches and within-farm virus contamination.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017 Feb;49(2):337-346. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1197-0. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
6
Management and biosecurity practices on pig farms in the Western Highlands of Cameroon (Central Africa).
Vet Med Sci. 2020 Feb;6(1):82-91. doi: 10.1002/vms3.211. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
7
Evaluation of external biosecurity practices on southern Ontario sow farms.
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Apr 1;109(1-2):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
8
Development of a biosecurity assessment tool and the assessment of biosecurity levels by this tool on Japanese commercial swine farms.
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Feb;175:104848. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104848. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
9
Methods and Tools Used for Biosecurity Assessment in Livestock Farms in Africa: A Scoping Review.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Apr 16;2024:5524022. doi: 10.1155/2024/5524022. eCollection 2024.
10

本文引用的文献

4
Epidemiological Assessment of African Swine Fever Spread in the Dominican Republic.
Pathogens. 2023 Dec 1;12(12):1414. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12121414.
5
- Invited Review - Current status of global pig production: an overview and research trends.
Anim Biosci. 2024 Apr;37(4):719-729. doi: 10.5713/ab.23.0367. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
8
Exploring pig farmers' decision-making concerning biosecurity measures against African Swine Fever.
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Aug;217:105949. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105949. Epub 2023 May 30.
9
The Evolution of African Swine Fever in China: A Global Threat?
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 29;9:828498. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.828498. eCollection 2022.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验