• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估聚焦于猪场生物安全的研究的全球分布及特征:一项范围综述

Evaluating the Global Distribution and Characteristics of Research Studies Focusing on Swine Farm Biosecurity: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Agrawal Isha, Kerby Erin E, Varga Csaba

机构信息

Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana 61801, Illinois, USA.

University Library, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana 61801, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Nov 20;2024:6497633. doi: 10.1155/2024/6497633. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/6497633
PMID:40303078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12017066/
Abstract

Despite significant advances in swine biosecurity (BS) over the last decade, BS plans have yet to be broadly adopted on swine farms. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScRs) framework was followed to review the literature, describe the worldwide distribution of publications on swine farm BS, and characterize the research methodologies used. The final data extraction and analysis included 157 publications originating from 48 countries. Several publications (=93) used face-to-face interviews for data collection. An increase in the adoption of online and multimode approaches was detected after 2009. Many publications (=92) focussed on the impact of BS on the incidence of swine diseases such as porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) and African swine fever (ASF). Only 16 studies reported proposing incentives for study participation. Regions with high publication numbers were detected in Western and Southern Europe, Northeast of South America, and East Africa. Areas with low publication numbers were in Eastern Europe, North and Central Africa, Central America, and the Northwest of South America. This study identified the most common study methodologies used to assess swine farm BS. Countries with limited swine BS research studies were identified where future investigations are needed.

摘要

尽管在过去十年中猪生物安全(BS)方面取得了重大进展,但猪场的生物安全计划尚未得到广泛采用。我们遵循系统评价和Meta分析扩展的范围综述(PRISMA-ScRs)框架来回顾文献,描述猪场生物安全相关出版物的全球分布,并对所使用的研究方法进行特征描述。最终的数据提取和分析包括来自48个国家的157篇出版物。有几篇出版物(=93)采用面对面访谈来收集数据。2009年后,发现采用在线和多模式方法的情况有所增加。许多出版物(=92)关注生物安全对猪病发病率的影响,如猪繁殖与呼吸综合征(PRRS)和非洲猪瘟(ASF)。只有16项研究报告提出了参与研究的激励措施。在西欧和南欧、南美洲东北部以及东非发现了高出版物数量的地区。出版物数量低的地区在东欧、北非和中非、中美洲以及南美洲西北部。本研究确定了用于评估猪场生物安全的最常见研究方法。确定了猪生物安全研究有限的国家,并指出了未来需要进行调查的地方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/6220c91ddb08/TBED2024-6497633.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/107b0843e74a/TBED2024-6497633.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/983a860b9abf/TBED2024-6497633.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/36637bacb832/TBED2024-6497633.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/c88646d53854/TBED2024-6497633.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/6220c91ddb08/TBED2024-6497633.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/107b0843e74a/TBED2024-6497633.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/983a860b9abf/TBED2024-6497633.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/36637bacb832/TBED2024-6497633.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/c88646d53854/TBED2024-6497633.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66dc/12017066/6220c91ddb08/TBED2024-6497633.006.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Global Distribution and Characteristics of Research Studies Focusing on Swine Farm Biosecurity: A Scoping Review.评估聚焦于猪场生物安全的研究的全球分布及特征:一项范围综述
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Nov 20;2024:6497633. doi: 10.1155/2024/6497633. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessment of biosecurity practices and development of a scoring system in swine farms using item response theory.运用项目反应理论评估猪场生物安全措施并制定评分系统
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Jun 1;167:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
3
Expert Opinion on the Perceived Effectiveness and Importance of On-Farm Biosecurity Measures for Cattle and Swine Farms in Switzerland.瑞士牛场和猪场农场生物安全措施的感知有效性和重要性专家意见
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 10;10(12):e0144533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144533. eCollection 2015.
4
African swine fever outbreak on a medium-sized farm in Uganda: biosecurity breaches and within-farm virus contamination.乌干达一个中型农场发生非洲猪瘟疫情:生物安全漏洞与农场内病毒污染
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017 Feb;49(2):337-346. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1197-0. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
5
Use of Bayesian Belief Network techniques to explore the interaction of biosecurity practices on the probability of porcine disease occurrence in Canada.运用贝叶斯信念网络技术探究加拿大生物安全措施之间的相互作用对猪病发生概率的影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Sep 1;131:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
6
Management and biosecurity practices on pig farms in the Western Highlands of Cameroon (Central Africa).喀麦隆中西部高地(中非)养猪场的管理和生物安全措施。
Vet Med Sci. 2020 Feb;6(1):82-91. doi: 10.1002/vms3.211. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
7
Evaluation of external biosecurity practices on southern Ontario sow farms.安大略省南部母猪场外部生物安全措施评估。
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Apr 1;109(1-2):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
8
Development of a biosecurity assessment tool and the assessment of biosecurity levels by this tool on Japanese commercial swine farms.生物安全评估工具的开发以及该工具在日本商业养猪场的生物安全水平评估。
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Feb;175:104848. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104848. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
9
Methods and Tools Used for Biosecurity Assessment in Livestock Farms in Africa: A Scoping Review.非洲畜牧场生物安全评估的方法与工具:一项范围综述
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Apr 16;2024:5524022. doi: 10.1155/2024/5524022. eCollection 2024.
10
Development and validation of a scoring system to assess the relative vulnerability of swine breeding herds to the introduction of PRRS virus.一种评估猪繁殖猪群引入猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒相对易感性的评分系统的开发与验证。
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Nov 15;160:116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing and comparing disease prevention knowledge, attitudes, and practices among veterinarians in Illinois, United States of America.评估和比较美国伊利诺伊州兽医的疾病预防知识、态度和实践。
Prev Vet Med. 2024 Jul;228:106223. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106223. Epub 2024 May 13.
2
Biosecurity Insights from the United States Swine Health Improvement Plan: Analyzing Data to Enhance Industry Practices.美国生猪健康改善计划中的生物安全见解:分析数据以改进行业实践。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Apr 8;14(7):1134. doi: 10.3390/ani14071134.
3
Biosecurity measures for the prevention of African swine fever on German pig farms: comparison of farmers' own appraisals and external veterinary experts' evaluations.
德国猪场预防非洲猪瘟的生物安全措施:农民自身评估与外部兽医专家评估的比较
Porcine Health Manag. 2024 Mar 11;10(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40813-024-00365-x.
4
Epidemiological Assessment of African Swine Fever Spread in the Dominican Republic.多米尼加共和国非洲猪瘟传播的流行病学评估
Pathogens. 2023 Dec 1;12(12):1414. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12121414.
5
- Invited Review - Current status of global pig production: an overview and research trends.特邀综述——全球生猪生产现状:概述与研究趋势
Anim Biosci. 2024 Apr;37(4):719-729. doi: 10.5713/ab.23.0367. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
6
The Influencing Factors of "Post-African Swine Fever" Pig Farm Biosecurity: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China.“非洲猪瘟后”猪场生物安全的影响因素:来自中国四川省的证据
Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;13(19):3053. doi: 10.3390/ani13193053.
7
Assessing and improving on-farm biosecurity knowledge and practices among swine producers and veterinarians through online surveys and an educational website in Illinois, United States.通过在线调查和美国伊利诺伊州的一个教育网站,评估并提高养猪户和兽医的农场生物安全知识及实践水平。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jun 9;10:1167056. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1167056. eCollection 2023.
8
Exploring pig farmers' decision-making concerning biosecurity measures against African Swine Fever.探讨养猪户针对非洲猪瘟采取生物安全措施的决策。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Aug;217:105949. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105949. Epub 2023 May 30.
9
The Evolution of African Swine Fever in China: A Global Threat?中国非洲猪瘟的演变:全球威胁?
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 29;9:828498. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.828498. eCollection 2022.
10
A biosecurity survey on Iberian pig farms in Spain: Farmers' attitudes towards the implementation of measures and investment.西班牙伊比利亚猪养殖场生物安全调查:养殖户对措施实施和投资的态度
Res Vet Sci. 2022 Jul;145:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.02.017. Epub 2022 Feb 11.