• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗费用的因素。

Factors predicting the cost of endovascular management of intracranial aneurysms.

作者信息

Mazouni Traki, Bokri Emna, Azzouz Faouzi, Sammoud Skander, Hammami Nadia, Hasni Nesrine

机构信息

Department of pharmacy, National Institute of Neurology Mongi-Ben Hamida.

National Institute of Neurology Mongi-Ben Hamida.

出版信息

Tunis Med. 2023 Nov 5;101(11):805-809.

PMID:38468580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11261519/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The management of intracranial aneurysms has evolved in the recent years, and endovascular coiling has become the first treatment option in many countries. In Tunisia, this neuroendovascular treatment meets a progressive but slow development, slowed down, by the economic component.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the global cost of endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms and determine the factors influencing the variation of direct medical cost.

METHODS

A prospective study including patients who underwent interventional neuroradiology procedures for intracranial aneurysms between March 2019 and June 2019. Total cost (direct medical and non medical cost) was assessed using the micro-costing method. Statistical analysis (descriptive followed by a multivariate analysis) was performed by PSPP software with a p-value< 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included (mean age 54±14 years). The average overall cost of treatment was 15 877 DT (5 081€), ranging from 8 005 DT (2 562 €) to 36 325 DT (11 624 €). The average cost of medical devices used during the procedure was 13 548 DT (4 335 €) which represents 85.3% of the total cost. The direct medical cost was particularly influenced by aneurysm's and neck's size, and by the total cost of coils.

CONCLUSIONS

The medical devices used during the procedure greatly influenced the direct medical cost of the management of intracranial aneurysms.

摘要

引言

近年来,颅内动脉瘤的治疗方法不断发展,血管内栓塞术在许多国家已成为首选治疗方案。在突尼斯,这种神经血管内治疗方法虽有进展,但发展缓慢,受到经济因素的制约。

目的

本研究旨在评估颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗的总体费用,并确定影响直接医疗费用变化的因素。

方法

一项前瞻性研究,纳入了2019年3月至2019年6月期间接受颅内动脉瘤介入神经放射治疗的患者。采用微观成本核算方法评估总成本(直接医疗成本和非医疗成本)。使用PSPP软件进行统计分析(先进行描述性分析,然后进行多变量分析),p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

纳入29例患者(平均年龄54±14岁)。治疗的平均总成本为15877第纳尔(5081欧元),范围从8005第纳尔(2562欧元)到36325第纳尔(11624欧元)。手术过程中使用的医疗器械平均成本为13548第纳尔(4335欧元),占总成本的85.3%。直接医疗成本尤其受到动脉瘤和瘤颈大小以及线圈总成本的影响。

结论

手术过程中使用的医疗器械对颅内动脉瘤治疗的直接医疗成本有很大影响。

相似文献

1
Factors predicting the cost of endovascular management of intracranial aneurysms.预测颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗费用的因素。
Tunis Med. 2023 Nov 5;101(11):805-809.
2
Comparative Cost Analysis for the Surgical and Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in Taiwan: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.台湾颅内破裂动脉瘤手术和血管内治疗的成本比较分析:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e485-e490. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
3
Endovascular Coiling Versus Microsurgical Clipping for Patients With Ruptured Very Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Management Strategies and Clinical Outcomes of 162 Cases.破裂微小颅内动脉瘤患者的血管内栓塞与显微手术夹闭:162例患者的治疗策略与临床结果
World Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;99:763-769. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.079. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
4
Analysis of cerebrovascular aneurysm treatment cost: retrospective cohort comparison of clipping, coiling, and flow diversion.分析脑血管瘤治疗费用:夹闭、弹簧圈栓塞和血流导向装置治疗的回顾性队列比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 May;44(5):E3. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17775.
5
Endovascular Coiling versus Surgical Clipping for Poor-Grade Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Postoperative Complications and Clinical Outcome in a Multicenter Poor-Grade Aneurysm Study.血管内栓塞术与手术夹闭术治疗低级别破裂颅内动脉瘤:多中心低级别动脉瘤研究中的术后并发症及临床结局
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 May;37(5):873-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4649. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
6
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Economic Comparison Between Endovascular Coiling Versus Neurosurgical Clipping for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.颅内破裂动脉瘤血管内栓塞与神经外科夹闭术经济比较的系统评价与Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:269-275. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
7
Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Barricade coils: Feasibility, procedural safety, and immediate postoperative anatomical results.使用Barricade弹簧圈对颅内动脉瘤进行血管内治疗:可行性、手术安全性及术后即刻解剖学结果
J Neuroradiol. 2016 Oct;43(5):353-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
8
Rescue Stenting Using Neuroform Atlas Stent During Coiling Protrusion for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.在颅内破裂动脉瘤的线圈突出期间使用 Neuroform Atlas 支架进行挽救性支架置入。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;128:e454-e460. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.176. Epub 2019 May 1.
9
Aneurysm Characteristics, Study Population, and Endovascular Techniques for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms in a Large, Prospective, Multicenter Cohort: Results of the Analysis of Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm Study.颅内动脉瘤的特征、研究人群和血管内治疗技术:颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗研究再通分析的结果。这是一项大型前瞻性多中心队列研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):517-523. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5991. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
10
Pipeline embolization device versus coiling for the treatment of large and giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a cost-effectiveness analysis.用于治疗大型和巨大型未破裂颅内动脉瘤的管道栓塞装置与弹簧圈栓塞术:成本效益分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1749.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of cerebrovascular aneurysm treatment cost: retrospective cohort comparison of clipping, coiling, and flow diversion.分析脑血管瘤治疗费用:夹闭、弹簧圈栓塞和血流导向装置治疗的回顾性队列比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 May;44(5):E3. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17775.
2
Cerebral aneurysm coiling: a predictive model of hospitalization cost.脑动脉瘤栓塞术:住院费用预测模型
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Jul;7(7):543-8. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011222. Epub 2014 May 26.
3
Prevalence of and risk factors for intracranial aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤的患病率及危险因素
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jul;10(7):595-7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70125-9.
4
Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis.未破裂颅内动脉瘤的患病率,重点关注性别、年龄、合并症、国家和时间段:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jul;10(7):626-36. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0.
5
[Embolization of intracranial aneurysms: reimbursement and perspectives].[颅内动脉瘤的栓塞治疗:报销及前景]
J Radiol. 2010 Sep;91(9 Pt 1):895-900. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(10)70131-1.
6
Cost-effectiveness of clipping vs coiling of intracranial aneurysms after subarachnoid hemorrhage in a developing country--a prospective study.发展中国家蛛网膜下腔出血后颅内动脉瘤夹闭术与血管内栓塞术的成本效益——一项前瞻性研究
Surg Neurol. 2009 Oct;72(4):355-60; discussion 360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.11.003. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
7
International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion.颅内破裂动脉瘤的神经外科夹闭术与血管内栓塞术的国际蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤试验(ISAT):2143例患者的生存、依赖、癫痫发作、再出血、亚组及动脉瘤闭塞效果的随机对照研究
Lancet. 2005;366(9488):809-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5.
8
Natural history, evaluation, and management of intracranial vascular malformations.颅内血管畸形的自然史、评估与管理
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Feb;80(2):269-81. doi: 10.4065/80.2.269.
9
Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment.未破裂颅内动脉瘤:自然病史、临床结局以及手术和血管内治疗风险
Lancet. 2003 Jul 12;362(9378):103-10. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13860-3.
10
[Neurosurgical and endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a cost analysis of two different strategies at the University Hospital of Bordeaux (France)].[颅内动脉瘤的神经外科和血管内治疗:法国波尔多大学医院两种不同策略的成本分析]
Neurochirurgie. 2002 Nov;48(5):419-25.