• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受来自 9/10 HLA 匹配无关供体移植后大剂量环磷酰胺预防移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)患者与接受来自完全匹配相关供体移植后标准 GvHD 预防患者的感染并发症比较。

Comparison of Infectious Complications in Patients Receiving High-Dose Cyclophosphamide as GvHD Prophylaxis After Transplantation From A 9/10 HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor with Standard GvHD Prophylaxis After Transplant From A Fully Matched Related Donor.

作者信息

Sayýn Selim, Yýldýrým Murat, Cömert Melda, Uğur Bilge, Yýlmaz Esra Şafak, Avcu Ferit, Ural Ali Uğur, Aylı Meltem

机构信息

Gülhane Education and Research Hospital, Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Ankara, Turkey.

Gülhane Educational and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Informatics, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 1;16(1):e2024016. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2024.016. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.4084/MJHID.2024.016
PMID:38468829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10927186/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether cyclophosphamide administered after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from 9/10 HLA-Matched Unrelated Donors (MMUD) increases the rates of bacterial, fungal, viral infections, complications (hemorrhagic cystitis (HC)), and infection-related mortality compared to allogeneic stem cell transplantation from matched related donors (MRD).

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter study. 45 MMUD ASCT patients who received posttransplant cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+calcineurin inhibitor compared with 45 MRD ASCT patients who received methotrexate+calcineurin inhibitor.

RESULTS

Although there was a statistically significant prolongation of neutrophil engraftment time in the PTCy arm, there was no statistically significant difference in bacterial infection frequencies between the groups (PTCy; 9 (20%), control; 8 (17.8%), p=0.778). The distribution of CMV infection in the first 100 days was similar (p=0.827), but the distribution of CMV infection rate between the 100th and 365th days was observed more frequently in the control group (p=0.005). HC rates and their grades were similar in both groups (PTCy; 4 (8.8%), control; 6 (13.3%) p=0.502). The rates of VZV infection and invasive aspergillosis were similar in the PTCy and control groups (13.3% in the PTCy and 17.8% in the control group p=0.561). There is also no statistically significant difference in survival analysis (OS, LFS, GRFS, RI, IRM, NRM) between groups. However, the incidence of cGVHD was significantly higher in the control group (P=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of PTCy to standard GvHD prophylaxis in MMUD ASCT does not lead to an increase in CMV reactivation, bacterial infections, invasive fungal infection, viral hemorrhagic cystitis, or mortality.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估与来自匹配相关供者(MRD)的异基因干细胞移植相比,在9/10 HLA匹配的无关供者(MMUD)的异基因干细胞移植(ASCT)后给予环磷酰胺是否会增加细菌、真菌、病毒感染率、并发症(出血性膀胱炎(HC))以及感染相关死亡率。

方法

这是一项回顾性多中心研究。45例接受移植后环磷酰胺+甲氨蝶呤+钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的MMUD ASCT患者与45例接受甲氨蝶呤+钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的MRD ASCT患者进行比较。

结果

尽管在接受移植后环磷酰胺的组中中性粒细胞植入时间有统计学意义的延长,但两组之间的细菌感染频率无统计学显著差异(移植后环磷酰胺组;9例(20%),对照组;8例(17.8%),p=0.778)。前100天内巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的分布相似(p=0.827),但在第100天至365天之间,CMV感染率在对照组中观察到更频繁(p=0.005)。两组的HC发生率及其分级相似(移植后环磷酰胺组;4例(8.8%),对照组;6例(13.3%),p=0.502)。移植后环磷酰胺组和对照组的水痘带状疱疹病毒(VZV)感染率和侵袭性曲霉病发生率相似(移植后环磷酰胺组为13.3%,对照组为17.8%,p=0.561)。两组之间的生存分析(总生存期、无白血病生存期、无移植物抗宿主病生存期、复发率、感染相关死亡率、非复发死亡率)也无统计学显著差异。然而,对照组慢性移植物抗宿主病(cGVHD)的发生率显著更高(P=0.035)。

结论

在MMUD ASCT的标准移植物抗宿主病预防中添加移植后环磷酰胺不会导致CMV再激活、细菌感染、侵袭性真菌感染、病毒性出血性膀胱炎或死亡率增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7079/10927186/49f0493352c4/mjhid-16-1-e2024016f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7079/10927186/bf1fa41e5bd0/mjhid-16-1-e2024016f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7079/10927186/49f0493352c4/mjhid-16-1-e2024016f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7079/10927186/bf1fa41e5bd0/mjhid-16-1-e2024016f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7079/10927186/49f0493352c4/mjhid-16-1-e2024016f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Infectious Complications in Patients Receiving High-Dose Cyclophosphamide as GvHD Prophylaxis After Transplantation From A 9/10 HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor with Standard GvHD Prophylaxis After Transplant From A Fully Matched Related Donor.接受来自 9/10 HLA 匹配无关供体移植后大剂量环磷酰胺预防移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)患者与接受来自完全匹配相关供体移植后标准 GvHD 预防患者的感染并发症比较。
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 1;16(1):e2024016. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2024.016. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis after "Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation from 9/10 HLA Matched Unrelated Donor'' with Standard Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis after "10/10 HLA Matched Relative Donor'' Transplant.“9/10 HLA配型相合的无关供者异基因干细胞移植”后基于环磷酰胺的移植物抗宿主病预防与“10/10 HLA配型相合的亲属供者移植”后标准移植物抗宿主病预防的比较。
Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2024 Jul 1;18(3):227-239. doi: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v18i3.16103.
3
Single Antigen-Mismatched Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using High-Dose Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Is a Suitable Alternative for Patients Lacking HLA-Matched Donors.采用高剂量移植后环磷酰胺的单抗原不合无关造血干细胞移植是缺乏 HLA 匹配供体患者的合适替代方法。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Jun;24(6):1196-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
4
A Calcineurin Inhibitor Free Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Matched Related and Matched Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.针对接受同胞全相合及无关供者异基因造血细胞移植患者的无钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂移植物抗宿主病预防方案
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 May;29(5):327.e1-327.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
5
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with cord blood versus mismatched unrelated donor with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in acute myeloid leukemia.异基因造血干细胞移植联合脐带血与移植后环磷酰胺治疗急性髓系白血病的非匹配无关供者。
J Hematol Oncol. 2021 May 3;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01086-2.
6
Risk of Cytomegalovirus Infection with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Haploidentical and HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation.移植后环磷酰胺在单倍体相合和 HLA 匹配的无关供者移植中巨细胞病毒感染的风险。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Apr;28(4):213.e1-213.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
7
Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide-based Graft-versus-host-disease Prophylaxis Compared to Methotrexate-cyclosporine a in Matched-related Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.移植后环磷酰胺为基础的移植物抗宿主病预防与甲氨蝶呤-环孢素 A 在亲缘全相合异基因造血干细胞移植。
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2023 May 23;16(4):379-387. doi: 10.56875/2589-0646.1065.
8
High-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Tacrolimus as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Matched and Mismatched Unrelated Donor Transplantation.高剂量环磷酰胺和他克莫司预防亲缘和非亲缘供者移植后移植物抗宿主病。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Jul;27(7):619.e1-619.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.03.022. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
9
The Benefits of the Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Both Haploidentical and Mismatched Unrelated Donor Setting in Allogeneic Stem Cells Transplantation.同种异体干细胞移植中,移植后环磷酰胺在半相合和不合亲缘供者设定中的获益。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 17;24(6):5764. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065764.
10
Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Versus Tacrolimus and Methotrexate Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for HLA-Matched Donor Transplantation.移植后环磷酰胺与他克莫司及甲氨蝶呤用于 HLA 配型相合供体移植的移植物抗宿主病预防
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Oct;28(10):695.e1-695.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.07.021. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms.世界卫生组织血液淋巴肿瘤分类第五版:髓系和组织细胞/树突状肿瘤。
Leukemia. 2022 Jul;36(7):1703-1719. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms.《世界卫生组织造血与淋巴组织肿瘤分类》第五版:淋巴肿瘤。
Leukemia. 2022 Jul;36(7):1720-1748. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
A Clinical Review of the Different Strategies to Minimize Hemorrhagic Cystitis Associated with the Use of Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in an Allogeneic Transplant.
异基因移植中环磷酰胺应用后相关出血性膀胱炎的不同策略最小化的临床评价
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Jul;28(7):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 14.
4
Post-transplant cyclophosphamide in one-antigen mismatched unrelated donor transplantation versus haploidentical transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT.单抗原错配非亲缘供者移植与单倍体相合移植在急性髓系白血病中应用环磷酰胺:来自 EBMT 急性白血病工作组的研究。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Apr;57(4):562-571. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01577-x. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
5
HLA-haploidentical vs matched unrelated donor transplants with posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis.HLA 单倍体相合与亲缘无关供者移植后应用环磷酰胺预防。
Blood. 2021 Jul 22;138(3):273-282. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011281.
6
Posttransplant cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis for peripheral blood stem cell HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant.移植后环磷酰胺作为外周血造血干细胞 HLA 不相合非亲缘供者移植的移植物抗宿主病预防。
Blood Adv. 2021 Jun 22;5(12):2650-2659. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004192.
7
Use of high-dose mesna and hyperhydration leads to lower incidence of hemorrhagic cystitis after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based allogeneic transplantation.高剂量美司钠和水化治疗可降低移植后基于环磷酰胺的同种异体移植后出血性膀胱炎的发生率。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021 Oct;56(10):2464-2470. doi: 10.1038/s41409-021-01364-0. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
8
Risk factors of BK viral hemorrhagic cystitis in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.异基因造血干细胞移植后 BK 病毒出血性膀胱炎的危险因素。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;23(5):e13601. doi: 10.1111/tid.13601. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
9
Posttransplant cyclophosphamide is associated with increased cytomegalovirus infection: a CIBMTR analysis.移植后环磷酰胺与巨细胞病毒感染增加有关:CIBMTR 分析。
Blood. 2021 Jun 10;137(23):3291-3305. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020009362.
10
Impaired T- and NK-cell reconstitution after haploidentical HCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide.移植后环磷酰胺预处理的单倍体相合造血干细胞移植后 T 细胞和 NK 细胞重建受损。
Blood Adv. 2021 Jan 26;5(2):352-364. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003005.