Spidell Matthew T, Vaskuri Anna K
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2021 Jun 28;126:126011. doi: 10.6028/jres.126.011. eCollection 2021.
To calibrate laser power and energy meters, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) uses several detector-based realizations of the scale for optical radiant flux; these realizations are appropriate for specific laser power/energy ranges and optical coupling configurations. Calibrations from 1 µW to 2 W are currently based upon calorimeters. Validation by comparisons against other primary representations of the optical watt over the last two decades suggests the instruments operate well within their typical reported uncertainty level of 0.86 % with 95 % confidence. The dominant uncertainty contribution in the instrument is attributable to light scattered by the legacy window, which was not previously recognized. The inherent electro-optical inequivalence in the calorimeter's response was reassessed by thermal modeling to be 0.03 %. The principal contributions to the overall inequivalence were corrected, yielding a shift in scale representation under 0.2 % for typical calibrations. With updates in several uncertainty contributions resulting from this reassessment, the resulting combined expanded uncertainty (k = 2) is 0.84 %, which is essentially unchanged from the previous result provided to calibration customers.
为了校准激光功率计和能量计,美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)使用了基于探测器的几种光辐射通量量表实现方式;这些实现方式适用于特定的激光功率/能量范围和光耦合配置。目前,1微瓦至2瓦的校准基于量热计。在过去二十年中,通过与光瓦的其他主要表示方式进行比较来验证,结果表明这些仪器在其典型报告不确定度水平0.86%(95%置信度)内运行良好。仪器中主要的不确定度来源是由传统窗口散射的光,这一点以前未被认识到。通过热模型重新评估量热计响应中固有的电光不等效性为0.03%。对总体不等效性的主要贡献进行了校正,对于典型校准,量表表示的偏移在0.2%以下。由于此次重新评估,几个不确定度贡献得到更新,最终合成扩展不确定度(k = 2)为0.84%,与之前提供给校准客户的结果基本相同。