Suppr超能文献

先前使用抗肥胖药物与司美格鲁肽减肥效果之间的关联。

The association between previous use of anti-obesity medication and semaglutide weight loss outcomes.

机构信息

Precision Medicine for Obesity Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Jun;26(6):2167-2175. doi: 10.1111/dom.15523. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare weight loss outcomes between patients starting semaglutide who had previously been on another anti-obesity medication (AOM) compared to those who were AOM-naïve.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study in patients with overweight or obesity taking semaglutide for weight loss for a duration of 3 to 12 months. Our primary endpoint was assessment of percentage of total body weight loss (TBWL) in patients who started semaglutide as their first AOM (AOM-naïve) compared to those who started semaglutide and had previously taken another AOM (non-AOM-naïve). The secondary outcome was a comparison of the proportions of patients achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15% and ≥20% TBWL between the groups. Our endpoints were analysed using independent t-tests and ANOVA/ANCOVA for continuous variables and Pearson's test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

This study included 305 patients. Outcomes of semaglutide treatment were superior in AOM-naïve patients (n = 231) compared to non-AOM-naïve patients (n = 74) at 3 (6.3% vs. 3.8%), 6 (10.6% vs. 6.7%), 9 (14.0% vs. 9.1%) and 12 months (14.3% vs. 10.6%; p < 0.0001 at 3, 6 and 9 months, and p = 0.01 at 12 months). A greater proportion of patients in the AOM-naïve group achieved a TBWL ≥ 15% (48% vs 21%; p = 0.02) and ≥20% (27% vs 4% p < 0.01) at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The use of semaglutide in patients with previous intake of other AOMs was associated with inferior weight loss outcomes in comparison to patients who were AOM-naïve.

摘要

目的

比较起始使用司美格鲁肽且之前使用过其他减肥药(AOM)与起始使用司美格鲁肽且未曾使用过其他减肥药(AOM 初治)的患者之间的减重效果。

材料和方法

我们对使用司美格鲁肽进行减重治疗且时长为 3 至 12 个月的超重或肥胖患者进行了回顾性研究。我们的主要终点是比较起始使用司美格鲁肽且之前使用过其他 AOM(AOM 经治)与起始使用司美格鲁肽且未曾使用过其他 AOM(AOM 初治)的患者的体重总降幅百分比(TBWL)。次要终点是比较两组患者达到 ≥5%、≥10%、≥15%和≥20%TBWL 的比例。我们采用独立 t 检验和连续变量的 ANOVA/ANCOVA 以及分类变量的 Pearson 检验对终点进行分析。

结果

这项研究共纳入 305 例患者。在 3、6、9 和 12 个月时,AOM 初治患者(n=231)的司美格鲁肽治疗结局优于 AOM 经治患者(n=74)(6.3% vs. 3.8%、10.6% vs. 6.7%、14.0% vs. 9.1%、14.3% vs. 10.6%;p<0.0001,在 3、6 和 9 个月时,p=0.01,在 12 个月时)。在 12 个月时,AOM 初治组中达到 TBWL≥15%(48% vs. 21%;p=0.02)和≥20%(27% vs. 4%;p<0.01)的患者比例更高。

结论

与 AOM 初治患者相比,起始使用司美格鲁肽且之前使用过其他 AOM 的患者的减重效果较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验