Precision Medicine for Obesity Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine.
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 1;58(7):650-655. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001931.
We aim to describe the weight loss outcomes of patients with celiac disease (CeD) taking antiobesity medications (AOMs) and compare it with the weight loss outcomes of patients without CeD taking AOMs.
Increasing rates of obesity and obesity-associated comorbidities have been previously reported in patients with CeD on a gluten-free diet. The effectiveness of AOMs in this population has not been previously described.
In our retrospective cohort study, we matched 39 patients with treated CeD to 78 patients without CeD based on sex and AOM. We assessed the weight loss outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting the AOM in both cohorts and analyzed if there was a differential response when comparing by type of AOM [injectable glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists vs. oral non-GLP-1 AOMs].
Both cohorts had similar baseline demographic and anthropometric characteristics. At 12 months, the CeD cohort had a nonsignificantly inferior total body weight loss percentage compared with the cohort without CeD (6.5% vs. 9.5%, P =0.13). The CeD cohort had a similar proportion of patients achieving a total body weight loss percentage of ≥5% than the cohort without CeD (72.7% vs. 72.1%, P =1.00). No significant difference was observed when comparing the weight loss outcomes of injectables (GLP-1 receptor agonists) to oral AOMs. The proportion of patients reporting side effects was similar for both groups, regardless of the type of AOM.
Patients with CeD taking AOMs had similar weight loss outcomes to patients without CeD. Hence, AOMs can be a safe and effective therapy for weight management in patients with CeD.
我们旨在描述接受减肥药(AOM)治疗的乳糜泻(CeD)患者的减肥效果,并将其与未接受 CeD 治疗的接受 AOM 治疗的患者的减肥效果进行比较。
之前有报道称,接受无麸质饮食治疗的 CeD 患者肥胖率和肥胖相关合并症的发生率不断增加。该人群中 AOM 的有效性尚未得到描述。
在我们的回顾性队列研究中,我们根据性别和 AOM 将 39 名接受治疗的 CeD 患者与 78 名无 CeD 患者进行匹配。我们评估了两组患者在开始使用 AOM 后 3、6 和 12 个月的减肥效果,并分析了比较不同类型的 AOM(注射型胰高血糖素样肽 1(GLP-1)受体激动剂与口服非 GLP-1 AOM)时是否存在差异反应。
两组患者的基线人口统计学和人体测量学特征相似。在 12 个月时,CeD 组的总体体重减轻百分比与无 CeD 组相比无显著差异(6.5%比 9.5%,P=0.13)。CeD 组达到总体体重减轻百分比≥5%的患者比例与无 CeD 组相似(72.7%比 72.1%,P=1.00)。当比较注射剂(GLP-1 受体激动剂)与口服 AOM 的减肥效果时,未观察到显著差异。无论 AOM 的类型如何,两组患者报告不良反应的比例相似。
接受 AOM 治疗的 CeD 患者的减肥效果与未接受 CeD 治疗的患者相似。因此,AOM 可以成为 CeD 患者体重管理的一种安全有效的治疗方法。