Suppr超能文献

急救医疗服务中治疗癫痫儿童咪达唑仑给药途径与需要反复给药的关联。

Association of midazolam route of administration and need for recurrent dosing among children with seizures cared for by emergency medical services.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Division of Emergency Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2024 May;65(5):1294-1303. doi: 10.1111/epi.17940. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

National guidelines in the United States recommend the intramuscular and intranasal routes for midazolam for the management of seizures in the prehospital setting. We evaluated the association of route of midazolam administration with the use of additional benzodiazepine doses for children with seizures cared for by emergency medical services (EMS).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study from a US multiagency EMS dataset for the years 2018-2022, including children transported to the hospital with a clinician impression of seizures, convulsions, or status epilepticus, and who received an initial correct weight-based dose of midazolam (.2 mg/kg intramuscular, .1 mg/kg intravenous, .2 mg/kg intranasal). We evaluated the association of route of initial midazolam administration with provision of additional benzodiazepine dose in logistic regression models adjusted for age, vital signs, pulse oximetry, level of consciousness, and time spent with the patient.

RESULTS

We included 2923 encounters with patients who received an appropriate weight-based dose of midazolam for seizures (46.3% intramuscular, 21.8% intranasal, 31.9% intravenous). The median time to the first dose of midazolam from EMS arrival was similar between children who received intramuscular (7.3 min, interquartile range [IQR] = 4.6-12.5) and intranasal midazolam (7.8 min, IQR = 4.5-13.4) and longer for intravenous midazolam (13.1 min, IQR = 8.2-19.4). At least one additional dose of midazolam was given to 21.4%. In multivariable models, intranasal midazolam was associated with higher odds (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-1.76) and intravenous midazolam was associated with similar odds (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = .80-1.26) of requiring additional doses of benzodiazepines relative to intramuscular midazolam.

SIGNIFICANCE

Intranasal midazolam was associated with greater odds of repeated benzodiazepine dosing relative to initial intramuscular administration, but confounding factors could have affected this finding. Further study of the dosing and/or the prioritization of the intranasal route for pediatric seizures by EMS clinicians is warranted.

摘要

目的

美国国家指南建议在院前环境中使用肌肉内和鼻内途径给予咪达唑仑来治疗癫痫发作。我们评估了给予咪达唑仑途径与接受急救医疗服务 (EMS) 治疗的癫痫发作儿童使用额外苯二氮䓬类药物剂量之间的关联。

方法

我们对 2018 年至 2022 年期间来自美国多机构 EMS 数据集的一项回顾性队列研究进行了评估,该研究纳入了有临床医生印象的癫痫发作、惊厥或癫痫持续状态且接受初始正确体重的咪达唑仑剂量的儿童(肌肉内 0.2mg/kg、静脉内 0.1mg/kg、鼻内 0.2mg/kg)。我们在调整年龄、生命体征、脉搏血氧饱和度、意识水平和与患者在一起的时间的逻辑回归模型中评估了初始咪达唑仑给药途径与给予额外苯二氮䓬类药物剂量之间的关联。

结果

我们纳入了 2923 例接受了适当体重的咪达唑仑治疗癫痫发作的患者(46.3%肌肉内、21.8%鼻内、31.9%静脉内)。从 EMS 到达到给予首剂量咪达唑仑的中位数时间在接受肌肉内(7.3 分钟,四分位距 [IQR] = 4.6-12.5)和鼻内咪达唑仑(7.8 分钟,IQR = 4.5-13.4)的儿童之间相似,而静脉内咪达唑仑的时间较长(13.1 分钟,IQR = 8.2-19.4)。至少给予了一剂额外的咪达唑仑,占 21.4%。在多变量模型中,鼻内咪达唑仑与更高的需要额外苯二氮䓬类药物剂量的可能性相关(比值比 [OR] = 1.39,95%置信区间 [CI] = 1.10-1.76),而静脉内咪达唑仑与类似的可能性相关(OR = 1.00,95%CI = 0.80-1.26),与肌肉内咪达唑仑相比。

意义

与初始肌肉内给药相比,鼻内咪达唑仑与更频繁的重复给予苯二氮䓬类药物的可能性相关,但混杂因素可能影响了这一发现。需要进一步研究 EMS 临床医生对儿科癫痫发作的鼻内途径的给药和/或优先排序。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验