Research Group of Person-Centredness in an Ageing Society, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Department of History, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nurs Inq. 2024 Jul;31(3):e12631. doi: 10.1111/nin.12631. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
The persistence of multiple educational pathways into the nursing profession continues to occupy scholars internationally. In the Netherlands, various groups within the Dutch healthcare sector have tried to differentiate nursing practice on the basis of educational backgrounds for over 50 years. Proponents argue that such reforms are needed to retain bachelor-trained nurses, improve quality of care and strengthen nurses' position in the sector. Opponents have actively resisted reforms because they would mainly benefit bachelor-trained nurses and neglect practical experience and technical skills. This historical case study aims to provide insight in this apparent stalemate. Our analysis of this debate is informed by literature on institutional work and current debates within the historiography of nursing. This study contributes to a better understanding of this contemporary debate by examining a broader timeframe than is usually studied, and by highlighting nurses' roles in complex processes of change. We argue that, rather than being stuck in their professional development, different groups of nurses have forged their own path forward in their professional development, albeit via different strategies.
护理职业的多种教育途径持续存在,这一现象引起了国际学者的关注。在荷兰,荷兰医疗保健部门的各个团体 50 多年来一直试图根据教育背景来区分护理实践。支持者认为,这些改革对于留住经过本科培训的护士、提高护理质量和加强护士在该行业的地位是必要的。反对者则积极抵制改革,因为这些改革主要有利于本科培训的护士,而忽视了实践经验和技术技能。本案例研究旨在深入了解这一明显的僵局。我们对这场辩论的分析借鉴了制度工作文献以及护理史学界当前的辩论。通过比通常研究更广泛的时间框架,并强调护士在复杂变革过程中的作用,本研究有助于更好地理解这一当代辩论。我们认为,不同群体的护士并没有在职业发展中陷入僵局,而是通过不同的策略,为自己的职业发展开辟了道路。