Razafinjato Bénédicte, Rakotonirina Luc, Cordier Laura F, Rasoarivao Anna, Andrianomenjanahary Mamy, Marovavy Lanto, Hanitriniaina Feno, Andriamiandra Isaïe Jules, Mayfield Alishya, Palazuelos Daniel, Cowley Giovanna, Ramarson Andriamanolohaja, Ihantamalala Felana, Rakotonanahary Rado J L, Miller Ann C, Garchitorena Andres, McCarty Meg G, Bonds Matthew H, Finnegan Karen E
Pivot, Ranomafana, Fianarantsoa, Madagascar.
Madagascar Ministry of Public Health, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 12;4(3):e0002888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002888. eCollection 2024.
Despite widespread adoption of community health (CH) systems, there are evidence gaps to support global best practice in remote settings where access to health care is limited and community health workers (CHWs) may be the only available providers. The nongovernmental health organization Pivot partnered with the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) to pilot a new enhanced community health (ECH) model in rural Madagascar, where one CHW provided care at a stationary CH site while additional CHWs provided care via proactive household visits. The program included professionalization of the CHW workforce (i.e., targeted recruitment, extended training, financial compensation) and twice monthly supervision of CHWs. For the first eighteen months of implementation (October 2019-March 2021), we compared utilization and proxy measures of quality of care in the intervention commune (local administrative unit) and five comparison communes with strengthened community health programs under a different model. This allowed for a quasi-experimental study design of the impact of ECH on health outcomes using routinely collected programmatic data. Despite the substantial support provided to other CHWs, the results show statistically significant improvements in nearly every indicator. Sick child visits increased by more than 269.0% in the intervention following ECH implementation. Average per capita monthly under-five visits were 0.25 in the intervention commune and 0.19 in the comparison communes (p<0.01). In the intervention commune, 40.3% of visits were completed at the household via proactive care. CHWs completed all steps of the iCCM protocol in 85.4% of observed visits in the intervention commune (vs 57.7% in the comparison communes, p-value<0.01). This evaluation demonstrates that ECH can improve care access and the quality of service delivery in a rural health district. Further research is needed to assess the generalizability of results and the feasibility of national scale-up as the MoPH continues to define the national community health program.
尽管社区卫生(CH)系统已得到广泛采用,但在医疗保健服务受限且社区卫生工作者(CHW)可能是唯一可用医疗服务提供者的偏远地区,仍存在证据空白,无法支持全球最佳实践。非政府卫生组织“支点”(Pivot)与马达加斯加公共卫生部(MoPH)合作,在马达加斯加农村试点一种新的强化社区卫生(ECH)模式,其中一名社区卫生工作者在固定的社区卫生站点提供服务,其他社区卫生工作者则通过主动上门家访提供服务。该项目包括社区卫生工作者队伍的专业化(即定向招聘、强化培训、经济补偿)以及每月对社区卫生工作者进行两次监督。在实施的头18个月(2019年10月至2021年3月),我们比较了干预公社(当地行政单位)以及五个采用不同模式且强化了社区卫生项目的对照公社的医疗服务利用率和护理质量替代指标。这使得能够利用常规收集的项目数据,对强化社区卫生对健康结果的影响进行准实验研究设计。尽管为其他社区卫生工作者提供了大量支持,但结果显示几乎每个指标都有统计学上的显著改善。强化社区卫生实施后,干预地区患病儿童就诊量增加了269.0%以上。干预公社五岁以下儿童人均每月就诊量为0.25次,对照公社为0.19次(p<0.01)。在干预公社,40.3%的就诊是通过主动护理在家庭中完成的。在干预公社,社区卫生工作者在85.4%的观察就诊中完成了综合社区病例管理(iCCM)方案的所有步骤(对照公社为57.7%,p值<0.01)。该评估表明,强化社区卫生可以改善农村卫生区的医疗服务可及性和服务提供质量。随着公共卫生部继续确定国家社区卫生项目,需要进一步研究以评估结果的普遍性以及全国推广的可行性。