Cowan Emily T, Zhang Yiwen, Rottman Benjamin M, Murty Vishnu P
Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia PA 19122.
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 19;121(12):e2311077121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2311077121. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
The memory benefit that arises from distributing learning over time rather than in consecutive sessions is one of the most robust effects in cognitive psychology. While prior work has mainly focused on repeated exposures to the same information, in the real world, mnemonic content is dynamic, with some pieces of information staying stable while others vary. Thus, open questions remain about the efficacy of the spacing effect in the face of variability in the mnemonic content. Here, in two experiments, we investigated the contributions of mnemonic variability and the timescale of spacing intervals, ranging from seconds to days, to long-term memory. For item memory, both mnemonic variability and spacing intervals were beneficial for memory; however, mnemonic variability was greater at shorter spacing intervals. In contrast, for associative memory, repetition rather than mnemonic variability was beneficial for memory, and spacing benefits only emerged in the absence of mnemonic variability. These results highlight a critical role for mnemonic variability and the timescale of spacing intervals in the spacing effect, bringing this classic memory paradigm into more ecologically valid contexts.
相比于连续学习,将学习分散在不同时间进行所带来的记忆益处是认知心理学中最为稳固的效应之一。尽管先前的研究主要聚焦于对相同信息的反复接触,但在现实世界中,记忆内容是动态变化的,有些信息保持稳定,而有些则会改变。因此,面对记忆内容的变异性,间隔效应的有效性仍存在诸多悬而未决的问题。在此,我们通过两个实验,研究了记忆变异性以及从数秒到数天不等的间隔时间尺度对长期记忆的影响。对于项目记忆,记忆变异性和间隔时间都对记忆有益;然而,在较短的间隔时间内,记忆变异性更大。相比之下,对于联想记忆,重复而非记忆变异性对记忆有益,并且间隔效应仅在不存在记忆变异性时才会出现。这些结果凸显了记忆变异性和间隔时间尺度在间隔效应中的关键作用,将这一经典的记忆范式带入了更符合生态效度的情境中。