Jakab András, Palkovics Dániel, T Szabó Veronika, Szabó Balázs, Vincze-Bandi Eszter, Braunitzer Gábor, Lassila Lippo, Vallittu Pekka, Garoushi Sufyan, Fráter Márk
Department of Operative and Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University, H-1088 Budapest, Hungary.
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;16(5):590. doi: 10.3390/polym16050590.
In recent years, composite resin materials have been the most frequently used materials for direct restorations of posterior teeth. These materials have some clinically relevant limitations due to their lack of fracture toughness, especially when used in larger cavities with high volume factors or when utilized as direct or indirect overlays or crown restorations. Recently, short-fiber-reinforced composite materials have been used in bi-structure restorations as a dentine substituting material due to their superior mechanical properties; however, there is no scientific consensus as to whether they can be used as full restorations. The aim of our review was to examine the available literature and gather scientific evidence on this matter. Two independent authors performed a thorough literature search using PubMed and ScienceDirect up until December 2023. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using the QUIN tool. The authors selected in vitro studies that used short-fiber-reinforced composite materials as complete restorations, with a conventional composite material as a comparison group. Out of 2079 potentially relevant articles, 16 met our inclusion criteria. All of the included studies reported that the usage of short-fiber-reinforced composites improved the restoration's load-bearing capacity. Fifteen of the included publications examined the fracture pattern, and thirteen of them reported a more favorable fracture outcome for the short-fiber-reinforced group. Only one article reported a more favorable fracture pattern for the control group; however, the difference between groups was not significant. Within the limitations of this review, the evidence suggests that short-fiber-reinforced composites can be used effectively as complete restorations to reinforce structurally compromised teeth.
近年来,复合树脂材料一直是后牙直接修复最常用的材料。由于缺乏断裂韧性,这些材料存在一些临床相关局限性,特别是在用于具有高体积因子的较大窝洞时,或用作直接或间接覆盖物或冠修复体时。最近,短纤维增强复合材料因其优异的机械性能,已被用作双结构修复中的牙本质替代材料;然而,对于它们是否可作为全冠修复材料,尚无科学共识。我们综述的目的是研究现有文献,并收集关于此事的科学证据。两名独立作者使用PubMed和ScienceDirect进行了全面的文献检索,直至2023年12月。本研究遵循PRISMA指南,并使用QUIN工具评估偏倚风险。作者选择了使用短纤维增强复合材料作为全冠修复体的体外研究,并将传统复合材料作为对照组。在2079篇潜在相关文章中,16篇符合我们的纳入标准。所有纳入研究均报告,使用短纤维增强复合材料可提高修复体的承载能力。15篇纳入出版物研究了断裂模式,其中13篇报告短纤维增强组的断裂结果更有利。只有一篇文章报告对照组的断裂模式更有利;然而,组间差异不显著。在本综述的局限性内,证据表明短纤维增强复合材料可有效地用作全冠修复体,以增强结构受损的牙齿。