Interventional Cardiology Unit, Brasov County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 500326, Brasov, Romania.
Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine, "Transilvania" University of Brasov, 500019, Brasov, Romania.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04862-0.
Fast-conducting atrial fibrillation misinterpreted as ventricular tachycardia is the leading cause for inappropriate shocks in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD). These inappropriate shocks are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and cause great discomfort and stress.
We report the case of a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy, permanent atrial fibrillation, and a single-chamber DF-1 ICD implanted for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, who presented for multiple inappropriate internal shocks due to very fast-conducting atrial fibrillation, which was mislabeled as ventricular fibrillation by the ICD. Since the patient was under maximal atrioventricular nodal blocking medical therapy (beta-blockers and digitalis) and we didnt find any reversible causes for the heart rate acceleration, we opted for rate control with atrioventricular node ablation. To counteract the risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in this patient who would become totally pacemaker-dependent, we successfully performed left bundle branch area pacing. Because the patients ICD had a DF-1 connection and the battery had a long life remaining, we connected the physiological pacing lead to the IS-1 sense-pace port of the ICD. The 6-month follow-up showed an improvement in left ventricular function with no more inappropriate shocks.
Left bundle branch area pacing and atrioventricular node ablation in patients with an implantable single-chamber DF-1 defibrillator and fast-conducting permanent atrial fibrillation is a cost-efficient and very effective method to prevent and treat inappropriate shocks, avoiding the use of an additional dual-chamber or CRT-D device.
快速传导的心房颤动被误诊为室性心动过速,是导致植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者发生不适当电击的主要原因。这些不适当的电击会导致严重的发病率和死亡率,并给患者带来极大的不适和压力。
我们报告了一例患有缺血性心肌病、永久性心房颤动和单腔 DF-1 ICD 的患者,该患者因原发性预防心脏性猝死而植入 ICD,因非常快速传导的心房颤动而多次发生不适当的内部电击,这些电击被 ICD 误诊为室颤。由于患者接受了最大程度的房室结阻滞药物治疗(β受体阻滞剂和地高辛),并且我们没有发现任何导致心率加速的可逆原因,因此我们选择进行房室结消融以控制心率。为了抵消该患者因完全依赖起搏器而发生起搏诱导性心肌病的风险,我们成功地进行了左束支区域起搏。由于该患者的 ICD 具有 DF-1 连接且电池寿命还很长,我们将生理性起搏导线连接到 ICD 的 IS-1 感知-起搏端口。6 个月的随访显示,左心室功能得到改善,且没有再发生不适当的电击。
对于植入式单腔 DF-1 除颤器和快速传导性永久性心房颤动的患者,采用左束支区域起搏和房室结消融是一种经济有效的治疗方法,可以预防和治疗不适当的电击,避免使用额外的双腔或 CRT-D 设备。